Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H V2-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (97th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 3 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics13% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive89.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGigabyte A320M-S2H V2
MotherboardGigabyte GA-A320M-S2H V2-CF  (all builds)
Memory3.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191202
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 11 '20 at 05:43
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G-$75
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
76.6% Very good
Memory 72.6
1-Core 113
2-Core 231
76% 139 Pts
4-Core 460
8-Core 486
63% 473 Pts
64-Core 455
28% 455 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 76.6%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Graphics
AMD(1002 15D8) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.20
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
13% Very poor
Lighting 16.1
Reflection 15.3
Parallax 20.5
13% 17.3 fps
MRender 7.48
Gravity 16.5
Splatting 20.7
13% 14.9 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 13%
Great: 13%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ramsta S800 120GB
83GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RS77V0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 406 403 420 408 408 408 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
89.4% Excellent
Read 491
Write 407
Mixed 352
SusWrite 409
93% 415 MB/s
4K Read 25.1
4K Write 100
4K Mixed 20.7
118% 48.7 MB/s
DQ Read 129
DQ Write 332
DQ Mixed 28.4
80% 163 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 89.4%
Great: 79%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$20
466GB free
Firmware: KC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 131 132 131 133 133 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
75.2% Very good
Read 131
Write 124
Mixed 64.6
SusWrite 132
82% 113 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.9
150% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 75.2%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Ramsta-2666Mhz-8G 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
51.2% Above average
MC Read 19.1
MC Write 18.3
MC Mixed 15.4
50% 17.6 GB/s
SC Read 18.2
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 16.6
50% 17.7 GB/s
Latency 95.5
42% 95.5 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 51.2%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-A320M-S2H V2-CF Builds (Compare 1,542 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H V2-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $302
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback