Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive	39.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced.

PC Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2650 0 1,371 User benchmarks, average bench 60% None, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)	59.9% Above average	Memory 73.5 1-Core 62.7 2-Core 120 52% 85.3 Pts	4-Core 250 8-Core 499 44% 374 Pts	64-Core 500 31% 500 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 59.9% Great: 66%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Virtual HD 107GB 38 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 67GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.1.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 97 95 88 95 104 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	39.1% Below average	Read 280 Write 135 Mixed 312 SusWrite 94.7 46% 206 MB/s	4K Read 20 4K Write 14.4 4K Mixed 16.6 59% 17 MB/s	DQ Read 112 DQ Write 63.5 DQ Mixed 77.8 61% 84.5 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 39.1% Great: 85%
Microsoft Virtual Disk 161GB 55 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 54GB free Firmware: 1.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 94 91 87 95 102 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	36.2% Below average	Read 270 Write 266 Mixed 299 SusWrite 91.8 52% 232 MB/s	4K Read 18.8 4K Write 13.1 4K Mixed 13.1 52% 15 MB/s	DQ Read 118 DQ Write 60.4 DQ Mixed 77.3 61% 85.2 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 36.2% Great: 78%
Microsoft Virtual Disk 161GB 55 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 147GB free Firmware: 1.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 94 92 85 95 102 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	36.6% Below average	Read 271 Write 320 Mixed 295 SusWrite 92 55% 244 MB/s	4K Read 18.1 4K Write 12.6 4K Mixed 14.4 53% 15 MB/s	DQ Read 116 DQ Write 67.1 DQ Mixed 81.1 63% 87.9 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 36.6% Great: 78%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 32GB 5,781 User benchmarks, average bench 53% null MHz 3968, 28800 MB Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	81.8% Excellent	MC Read 36.1 MC Write 33.6 MC Mixed 30.4 95% 33.4 GB/s	SC Read 10.5 SC Write 5.2 SC Mixed 6.4 21% 7.37 GB/s	Latency 93.6 43% 93.6 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 81.8% Great: 101%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	1,322x
SVGA 3DVmwareBench 20%, 11,474 samples	1,145x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	1,060x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	830x
Virtual NVMe Disk 64GBVmwareBench 62%, 2,103 samples	458x
A400 480GBKingston $31Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	433x

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $325