Performance Results


Gaming 105% UFO	Desktop 84% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 170% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	138% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	257% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asrock X399 Professional Gaming (all builds)
Memory	51.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190827
Uptime	0.6 Days
Run Date	Oct 23 '20 at 22:23
Run Duration	147 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	16%

PC Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen TR 2990WX-$790 3,658 User benchmarks, average bench 79% SP3r2, 1 CPU, 32 cores, 64 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	75.4% Very good	Memory 74.9 1-Core 113 2-Core 220 75% 136 Pts	4-Core 407 8-Core 772 70% 590 Pts	64-Core 4,315 267% 4,315 Pts
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 75.4% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,148 158,856 User benchmarks, average bench 210% Nvidia(10DE 147D) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4875 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 456.71 Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	138% Outstanding	Lighting 161 Reflection 223 Parallax 321 131% 235 fps	MRender 316 Gravity 239 Splatting 137 178% 231 fps
Poor: 185% ↑ This bench: 138% Great: 230%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$690 3,492 User benchmarks, average bench 271% 1TB free (System drive) Firmware: 4B6QCXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1377 1431 1516 1533 1762 1777 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	257% Outstanding	Read 2,085 Write 1,037 Mixed 935 SusWrite 1,566 313% 1,406 MB/s	4K Read 39.5 4K Write 98.9 4K Mixed 53.6 181% 64 MB/s	DQ Read 538 DQ Write 451 DQ Mixed 546 395% 512 MB/s
Poor: 162% ↑ This bench: 257% Great: 354%
Amd-raid Array 1 6TB 22 User benchmarks, average bench 323% 1.5TB free Firmware: 9.2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 125 115 112 114 117 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	55.4% Above average	Read 351 Write 493 Mixed 338 SusWrite 117 73% 325 MB/s	4K Read 16.4 4K Write 51.6 4K Mixed 25.3 85% 31.1 MB/s	DQ Read 50.3 DQ Write 300 DQ Mixed 90.4 95% 147 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 55.4% Great: 464%
Amd-raid Array 2 16TB 36 User benchmarks, average bench 137% 9TB free Firmware: 9.2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 100 89 83 89 90 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	51.6% Above average	Read 88.6 Write 75 Mixed 64.2 SusWrite 89.7 59% 79.4 MB/s	4K Read 2.2 4K Write 4.7 4K Mixed 0.5 234% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 51.6% Great: 232%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMR64GX4M4C3333C16 4x16GB 64 User benchmarks, average bench 99% 4 of 8 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	72.5% Very good	MC Read 26.7 MC Write 25.6 MC Mixed 24.5 73% 25.6 GB/s	SC Read 21.7 SC Write 27.4 SC Mixed 23.6 69% 24.2 GB/s	Latency 90.6 44% 90.6 ns
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 72.5% Great: 137%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 100%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 121%

UFO

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	35x
RTX 2080S (Super)Nvidia $466Bench 131%, 261,508 samples	21x
RX 5700-XTAMD $199Bench 98%, 254,908 samples	13x

SSD
970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $320Bench 327%, 38,669 samples	12x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $98Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	10x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	7x

RAM
F4 DDR4 3866 C18 4x8GBG.SKILLBench 102%, 1,063 samples	9x
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 4x8GBG.SKILLBench 112%, 4,962 samples	7x
F4-3600C16-8GTZR F4-3866C18-8GTZR F4-3600C16-8GTZR F4-3866C18-8GTZR F4-3600C16-8GTZR F4-3866C18-8GTZR F4-3600C16-8GTZR F4-3866C18-8GTZR 64GBUnknownBench 102%, 20 samples	7x

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $1,030

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16