Asus X99-A/USB 3.1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 106%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 95%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics113% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive108% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (62%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus X99-A/USB 3.1  (all builds)
Memory42.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160818
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateNov 04 '20 at 11:17
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 62%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6800K-$103
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
91.1% Outstanding
Memory 94.5
1-Core 90
2-Core 170
71% 118 Pts
4-Core 472
8-Core 757
75% 615 Pts
64-Core 891
55% 891 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 91.1%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 445.87
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
113% Outstanding
Lighting 151
Reflection 176
Parallax 173
123% 167 fps
MRender 111
Gravity 162
Splatting 116
105% 129 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 113%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
173GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 436 328 262 254 246 242 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 482
Write 464
Mixed 348
SusWrite 295
89% 397 MB/s
4K Read 36.9
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 50
176% 64.4 MB/s
DQ Read 375
DQ Write 331
DQ Mixed 350
263% 352 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 108%
Great: 134%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$110
305GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 436 436 383 355 370 360 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
117% Outstanding
Read 424
Write 459
Mixed 399
SusWrite 390
94% 418 MB/s
4K Read 40.5
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 57.7
194% 70 MB/s
DQ Read 375
DQ Write 330
DQ Mixed 350
263% 352 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 117%
Great: 133%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
652GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 90 88 90 91 91 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
62.7% Good
Read 128
Write 137
Mixed 90.5
SusWrite 89.8
82% 111 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.1
207% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 62.7%
Great: 101%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3000 C15 8x8GB
8 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 2933 MHz clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
132% Outstanding
MC Read 46.7
MC Write 61.5
MC Mixed 49.5
150% 52.6 GB/s
SC Read 15
SC Write 20.7
SC Mixed 20.6
54% 18.8 GB/s
Latency 58.5
68% 58.5 ns
Poor: 103%
This bench: 132%
Great: 132%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-A/USB 3.1 Builds (Compare 1,312 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 81%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 71%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus X99-A/USB 3.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $410
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback