Informationcomputersystems PrimePC Solo30

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemInformationcomputersystems PrimePC Solo30  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK P8H61-M LX
Memory0.6 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.1 GHz
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130918
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 04 '20 at 16:33
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User UKR-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G630-$37
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
53.4% Above average
Memory 84.1
1-Core 70.5
2-Core 134
59% 96.1 Pts
4-Core 136
8-Core 133
18% 134 Pts
64-Core 139
9% 139 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 53.4%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$64
220GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 79 53 88 67 36 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
51.1% Above average
Read 117
Write 102
Mixed 14.5
SusWrite 60.1
53% 73.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.7
160% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 51.1%
Great: 85%
EXU3064GB 64GB
24GB free, PID 0917
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 22 23 26 26 25 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
10.9% Very poor
Read 27.9
Write 25.3
Mixed 25.4
SusWrite 23.3
34% 25.5 MB/s
4K Read 3.8
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0
24% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 10.9%
Great: 15%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Transcend JM1600KLN-2G 1x2GB
1 of 2 slots used
2GB DIMM DDR3 1067 MHz
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
22.5% Poor
MC Read 7.1
MC Write 6.7
MC Mixed 6.5
19% 6.77 GB/s
SC Read 6.6
SC Write 7.1
SC Mixed 6.3
19% 6.67 GB/s
Latency 73.3
54% 73.3 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 22.5%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PrimePC Solo30 Builds (Compare 11 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: Informationcomputersystems PrimePC Solo30

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 65% - Good Total price: $164
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make lots of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't care about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $251Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback