PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 56.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 33.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asrock FM2A68M-HD+ (all builds) |
Memory | 4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farver |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20181015 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Nov 06 '20 at 21:54 |
Run Duration | 140 Seconds |
Run User | DNK-User |
Background CPU | 85% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD Athlon X4 840 Quad Core
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
|
41.1%
Average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super)-$295
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
56.4%
Above average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
186GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0105A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 194 115 116 55 31 68 MB/s
|
33.5%
Below average
|
|||
Toshiba P300 1TB-$45
817GB free
Firmware: MS2OA8R0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 145 149 147 155 143 MB/s
|
83.5%
Excellent
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
G.SKILL Value DDR3 1600 C11 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
|
21.3%
Poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
A8-7600 APU (2014 D.Ka)AMDBench 42%, 31,243 samples | 38x |
Athlon X4 845AMD $50Bench 45%, 6,391 samples | 27x |
A8-7650K APU (2014 D.Ka)AMDBench 44%, 15,487 samples | 23x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 5%, 22,117 samples | 32x |
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 6%, 25,284 samples | 19x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 16x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 11% - Very poor | Total price: $30 |