Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 3-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 72% Battleship	Desktop 85% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 67% Battle cruiser


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (91st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 9 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	88.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	242% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Gigabyte AX370-Gaming 3
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 3-CF (all builds)
Memory	13.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180808
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 11 '20 at 22:10
Run Duration	126 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	15%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 1600-$110 392,253 User benchmarks, average bench 70% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	74.1% Very good	Memory 80.2 1-Core 106 2-Core 208 74% 131 Pts	4-Core 366 8-Core 638 61% 502 Pts	64-Core 863 53% 863 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 74.1% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Gigabyte(1458 3772) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 456.71 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	88.6% Excellent	Lighting 111 Reflection 117 Parallax 99.2 91% 109 fps	MRender 99.1 Gravity 104 Splatting 105 84% 103 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 88.6% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB256HBHQ-000L2 256GB 9,460 User benchmarks, average bench 198% 211GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3L1QEXH7 SusWrite @10s intervals: 1258 409 411 413 413 413 MB/s Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	242% Outstanding	Read 2,353 Write 2,168 Mixed 1,521 SusWrite 553 368% 1,649 MB/s	4K Read 60.4 4K Write 126 4K Mixed 78.2 259% 88.3 MB/s	DQ Read 924 DQ Write 596 DQ Mixed 853 611% 791 MB/s
Poor: 119% ↑ This bench: 242% Great: 264%
Hitachi HUA721010KLA330 1TB-$39 10,651 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 931GB free Firmware: GKAOA74A SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 82 83 83 83 83 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	46.9% Average	Read 80.3 Write 85.6 Mixed 41.6 SusWrite 82.7 53% 72.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 1 182% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 46.9% Great: 46%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C16 4x4GB 1,820 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	115% Outstanding	MC Read 46 MC Write 43.8 MC Mixed 37.4 121% 42.4 GB/s	SC Read 26.3 SC Write 41.4 SC Mixed 32.5 95% 33.4 GB/s	Latency 80.2 50% 80.2 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 115% Great: 115%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-AX370-Gaming 3-CF Builds (Compare 371 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 44%

Speed boat

Desktop 80%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 40%

Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 3-CF - $200

CPU
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $150Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	66x
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	43x
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $205Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	32x

GPU
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	31x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	28x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	22x

SSD
TEAML5Lite3D240G 240GBBench 96%, 6,836 samples	13x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $50Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	11x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $75Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	10x

RAM
Aegis DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 82%, 163,634 samples	20x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	10x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $55Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	8x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 101% - Outstanding

Total price: $516

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16