| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 16.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 47.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
| Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (76%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Foxconn H67M-S/H67M-V/H67M (all builds) |
| Memory | 2 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20130315 |
| Uptime | 0.9 Days |
| Run Date | Nov 12 '20 at 14:31 |
| Run Duration | 128 Seconds |
| Run User | GBR-User |
| Background CPU | 76% |
PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-2500
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
|
76.4%
Very good
|
71% 119 Pts
|
48% 356 Pts
|
22% 355 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 560 Ti-$188
Nvidia(10DE 092A) 1GB
CLim: 822 MHz, MLim: 1002 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
|
16.9%
Very poor
|
16% 21.2 fps
|
18% 22.8 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston SSDNow V300 60GB-$76
28GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 505ABBF1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 70 74 72 72 70 MB/s
|
47.9%
Average
|
25% 115 MB/s
|
107% 37.4 MB/s
|
30% 44 MB/s
|
|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.10 320GB-$80
239GB free
Firmware: 3.AAK
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 51 53 53 53 53 MB/s
|
34.8%
Below average
|
39% 52.9 MB/s
|
136% 1.03 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Corsair XMS3 DDR3 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
|
48.5%
Average
|
47% 16.6 GB/s
|
39% 13.6 GB/s
|
61% 65.4 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical H67M-S/H67M-V/H67M Builds (Compare 67 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Foxconn H67M-S/H67M-V/H67M
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples | 9x |
| Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 7x |
| Core i3-3220Intel $79Bench 52%, 71,790 samples | 6x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 5x |
| HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples | 4x |
| HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 4x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 57% - Above average | Total price: $342 |