Gigabyte GA-H61M-S2P

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.18% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H61M-S2P  (all builds)
Memory4.4 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120323
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 14 '20 at 04:34
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User EGY-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron G550-$49
Intel(R) Celeron(R) CPU G550 @ 2.60GHz, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
51.3% Above average
Memory 83.2
1-Core 66.2
2-Core 125
57% 91.4 Pts
4-Core 115
8-Core 121
16% 118 Pts
64-Core 128
8% 128 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 51.3%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
(pe64) ATI Radeon HD 5450/6230/6250/6290/6350/7350/8350/AMD Radeon R5 220
Sapphire(174B E225) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 14.502.1014.0
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
1.18% Terrible
Lighting 1.47
Reflection 1.77
Parallax 1.62
1% 1.62 fps
MRender 1.86
Gravity 0.83
Splatting 1.52
1% 1.4 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.18%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WL500GBSATA 500GB
384GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 05.0AG.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 70 26 70 72 99 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
29.8% Poor
Read 37.5
Write 63.1
Mixed 26.6
SusWrite 66.5
35% 48.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.6
86% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 29.8%
Great: 77%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Team-Elite-1600 6GB
1067, 1067 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
36.6% Below average
MC Read 11.5
MC Write 12.8
MC Mixed 12
35% 12.1 GB/s
SC Read 10.7
SC Write 12.4
SC Mixed 10.7
32% 11.3 GB/s
Latency 74.9
53% 74.9 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 36.6%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H61M-S2P Builds (Compare 786 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H61M-S2P

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 51% - Above average Total price: $118
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback