User System

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive	46.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

System	Hewlett-Packard
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 176B
Memory	13.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170713
Uptime	6 Days
Run Date	Nov 16 '20 at 14:26
Run Duration	150 Seconds
Run User	HRV-User
Background CPU	5%
CPU Throttled	99%

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3720QM-$100 9,911 User benchmarks, average bench 65% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	58.7% Above average	Memory 73.7 1-Core 72.4 2-Core 145 57% 97 Pts	4-Core 237 8-Core 364 37% 300 Pts	64-Core 363 22% 363 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 58.7% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K1000M 4,204 User benchmarks, average bench 3% HP(103C 176B) 2GB CLim: 850 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 385.73 Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 3% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 480GB-$175 24,007 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 410GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0C3J96R9 SusWrite @10s intervals: 339 252 152 133 122 107 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	46.2% Average	Read 397 Write 348 Mixed 23.3 SusWrite 184 53% 238 MB/s	4K Read 10.5 4K Write 10.3 4K Mixed 10.9 35% 10.6 MB/s	DQ Read 296 DQ Write 65.6 DQ Mixed 122 105% 161 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 46.2% Great: 92%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2004)-$47 218,164 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 931GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 108 111 110 113 113 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	63.9% Good	Read 112 Write 111 Mixed 58.7 SusWrite 111 72% 98.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.7 128% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 63.9% Great: 62%
UFD 2.0 Silicon-Power8G 8GB 1,859 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 7GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 12 10 12 11 12 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	7.05% Terrible	Read 23.3 Write 8.5 Mixed 4.8 SusWrite 11.2 14% 11.9 MB/s	4K Read 5.2 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 19% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 7.05% Great: 7%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 16KTF51264HZ-1G6M1 Samsung M471B5173DB0-YK0 16KTF51264HZ-1G6M1 Samsung M471B5173DB0-YK0 16GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	51% Above average	MC Read 19 MC Write 18.8 MC Mixed 16.8 52% 18.2 GB/s	SC Read 14.9 SC Write 13.6 SC Mixed 13.9 40% 14.1 GB/s	Latency 93.1 43% 93.1 ns
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 51% Great: 56%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

User System

Performance Results

PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)