Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

ADD TO PC
BUILD

Lenovo 030222U

Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 28% Raft	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.58% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	52.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Lenovo 030222U (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO 030222U
Memory	2.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100528
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 17 '20 at 21:41
Run Duration	118 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	8%

PC Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II P820 Triple-Core 243 User benchmarks, average bench 35% Socket S1G4, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 3 threads Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	28.6% Poor	Memory 43.8 1-Core 26.1 2-Core 53.1 26% 41 Pts	4-Core 79.1 8-Core 79.2 11% 79.1 Pts	64-Core 78.7 5% 78.7 Pts
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 28.6% Great: 38%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4250 11,054 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Legend(17AA 21B8) 256MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001 Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	0.58% Terrible	Lighting 0.67 Reflection 1.27 Parallax 0.41 0% 0.78 fps	MRender 0.9 Gravity 0.13 Splatting 1.22 1% 0.75 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.58% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Mushkin MKNSSDRE250GB-LT 250GB 642 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 212GB free (System drive) Firmware: P0614D SusWrite @10s intervals: 202 235 214 236 222 242 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	52.5% Above average	Read 393 Write 231 Mixed 230 SusWrite 225 60% 270 MB/s	4K Read 9.2 4K Write 36.6 4K Mixed 14.1 51% 20 MB/s	DQ Read 162 DQ Write 164 DQ Mixed 151 117% 159 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 52.5% Great: 100%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown M471B5673FH0-CH9 4GB 51 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 667, 0 MHz 2048, 2048 MB Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	23.3% Poor	MC Read 10.5 MC Write 5.7 MC Mixed 8.9 24% 8.37 GB/s	SC Read 5.9 SC Write 5.2 SC Mixed 6.6 17% 5.9 GB/s	Latency 185 22% 185 ns
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 23.3% Great: 26%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $215	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback