Apple MacPro7,1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics52.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive187% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory96GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 96GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemApple MacPro7,1  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-27AD2F918AE68F61
Memory90 GB free of 96 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201104
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 22 '20 at 22:09
Run Duration450 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon W-3235
CPU0, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
87.4% Excellent
Memory 74
1-Core 139
2-Core 278
88% 164 Pts
4-Core 539
8-Core 1,036
94% 787 Pts
64-Core 1,987
123% 1,987 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 87.4%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Pro 580X
Apple(106B 0206) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1200 MHz, MLim: 1710 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.10.36.01
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
52.5% Above average
Lighting 67.5
Reflection 61.7
Parallax 78.1
55% 69.1 fps
MRender 62.8
Gravity 65.2
Splatting 50.1
48% 59.4 fps
Poor: 34%
This bench: 52.5%
Great: 53%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OWC Aura P12 1.0TB
701GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFM12.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1399 925 921 1024 580 728 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
187% Outstanding
Read 990
Write 1,887
Mixed 1,344
SusWrite 930
293% 1,288 MB/s
4K Read 26.7
4K Write 96.7
4K Mixed 55.2
162% 59.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,294
DQ Write 454
DQ Mixed 540
486% 763 MB/s
Poor: 76%
This bench: 187%
Great: 301%
Crucial MX500 2TB-$155
524GB free
Firmware: M3CR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 359 360 362 361 356 360 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
88.9% Excellent
Read 351
Write 356
Mixed 317
SusWrite 360
78% 346 MB/s
4K Read 30.8
4K Write 69.4
4K Mixed 41.8
137% 47.3 MB/s
DQ Read 233
DQ Write 222
DQ Mixed 218
166% 224 MB/s
Poor: 83%
This bench: 88.9%
Great: 125%
Crucial MX500 2TB-$155
2TB free
Firmware: M3CR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 359 358 362 359 360 359 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
88.6% Excellent
Read 349
Write 355
Mixed 315
SusWrite 360
78% 345 MB/s
4K Read 30.7
4K Write 70.4
4K Mixed 42
138% 47.7 MB/s
DQ Read 213
DQ Write 218
DQ Mixed 209
159% 213 MB/s
Poor: 83%
This bench: 88.6%
Great: 125%
OWC Aura P12 1.0TB
501GB free
Firmware: ECFM12.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1578 1059 1060 1056 1056 1058 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
228% Outstanding
Read 1,270
Write 1,808
Mixed 1,526
SusWrite 1,144
326% 1,437 MB/s
4K Read 37
4K Write 129
4K Mixed 63.3
206% 76.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,097
DQ Write 834
DQ Mixed 1,011
744% 980 MB/s
Poor: 76%
This bench: 228%
Great: 301%
OWC Aura P12 1.0TB
892GB free
Firmware: ECFM12.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2182 1092 986 984 985 990 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
232% Outstanding
Read 1,292
Write 2,170
Mixed 1,403
SusWrite 1,203
344% 1517 MB/s
4K Read 40.9
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 61.3
200% 71.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,181
DQ Write 823
DQ Mixed 1,043
768% 1,016 MB/s
Poor: 76%
This bench: 232%
Great: 301%
OWC Aura P12 1.0TB
749GB free
Firmware: ECFM12.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2215 1143 1000 999 1003 1006 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
222% Outstanding
Read 1,313
Write 1,733
Mixed 1,468
SusWrite 1,228
325% 1,436 MB/s
4K Read 36.7
4K Write 97.5
4K Mixed 52.6
175% 62.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,372
DQ Write 435
DQ Mixed 989
707% 932 MB/s
Poor: 76%
This bench: 222%
Great: 301%
OWC SoftRAID 4TB
1TB free
Firmware: RAID
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 98 99 101 98 101 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
56.9% Above average
Read 97.9
Write 97
Mixed 50.3
SusWrite 99.8
63% 86.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1.1
213% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 56.9%
Great: 57%
Toshiba MG06ACA800E 8TB
6TB free
Firmware: 0104
SusWrite @10s intervals: 203 206 204 207 193 201 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 184
Write 193
Mixed 92.2
SusWrite 202
123% 168 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1.1
193% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 111%
Great: 132%
Toshiba MD06ACA800V 8TB
2TB free
Firmware: 0603
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 159 162 163 162 160 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
87.5% Excellent
Read 145
Write 143
Mixed 54.3
SusWrite 161
91% 126 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1.1
187% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 87.5%
Great: 136%
OWC SoftRAID 4TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: RAID
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 102 126 73 132 95 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
46.3% Average
Read 59.3
Write 46.4
Mixed 40.3
SusWrite 101
45% 61.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1.1
220% 1.53 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GR7CJR8N-WM HMA81GR7CJR8N-WM HMA84GR7DJR4N-WM HMA81GR7CJR8N-WM HMA81GR7CJR8N-WM HMA84GR7DJR4N-WM 95GB
2933, 2933, 2933, 2933, 2933, 2933 MHz
8192, 8192, 32767, 8192, 8192, 32767 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
137% Outstanding
MC Read 51
MC Write 68.4
MC Mixed 51.5
163% 57 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 20.9
SC Mixed 9.9
36% 12.6 GB/s
Latency 92.5
43% 92.5 ns
Poor: 137%
This bench: 137%
Great: 139%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MacPro7,1 Builds (Compare 23 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 56%
Gunboat

System: Apple MacPro7,1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 120% - Outstanding Total price: $93
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback