Average Bench: 94.3% (22nd of 621)

Based on 32,164 user benchmarks.  Device: 1002 687F Models: Radeon(TM) RX Vega, Radeon RX Vega

The Radeon RX Vega 64 is AMD’s latest Radeon flagship graphics card. It is the first Vega based gaming GPU and follows on from the recent launch of the Vega Frontier Edition. The Vega architecture is built on 14 nm silicon and contains next-generation compute units (nCUs) that have been engineered to be more efficient and powerful than ever before, enabling gamers to achieve higher frame rates at 4K. Each NCU houses 64 steam processors, of which the Vega 64 has 4096 (compared to 3584 in the Vega 56) which can process up to 13.7 TFLOPS (0.6 TFLOPS more than the Frontier Edition) in the liquid cooled version of the GPU. The new architecture also employs 8GB of second generation high-bandwidth memory (HBM2) which is able cope with more data, more quickly than previously. AMD describe this as the most significant leap in their GPU architecture for the last five years. Our graphics benchmarks place the performance of the Vega 64 amongst the best. Its effective speed is very close to that of the twice as expensive Frontier Edition (a workstation GPU with a gaming mode) and just behind NVIDIA’s similarly priced, but now 1 year old GTX 1080. Despite the hopes of AMD enthusiasts, the great performance from the Vega 64 has not been able to exceed the even greater performance from NVIDIA’s GTX 1080 Ti, released earlier this year. The 33% faster 1080 Ti offers better value for money than an RX 64 would even if it were available at its list price of $599. The best prices for RX 64's today are closer to $750 making the RX 64 somewhat redundant until prices drop down to the low $500 mark. [Sep '17 GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Excellent average bench

The AMD RX Vega-64 averaged just 5.7% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This is an excellent result which ranks the AMD RX Vega-64 near the top of the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat) 328fps
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy) 375fps

Good consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the AMD RX Vega-64 is 24.4%. This is a relatively narrow range which indicates that the AMD RX Vega-64 performs reasonably consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot) 234fps
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere) 189fps
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 32,164 samples)
Min Avg Max
252 Lighting 328 376
215 Reflection 234 247
462 Parallax 552 640
94.8% 371 fps
Min Avg Max
179 MRender 189 198
319 Gravity 375 425
272 Splatting 295 311
93.7% 286 fps
User Benchmarks Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
The fastest GPU (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
Sapphire(1DA2 E37F) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1630 MHz, MLim: 945 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.5.2
Lighting 356
Reflection 238
Parallax 609
103% 401 fps
MRender 190
Gravity 399
Splatting 299
98% 296 fps
CLim: 1663 MHz, MLim: 945 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.9.1
Lighting 346
Reflection 240
Parallax 589
100% 392 fps
MRender 193
Gravity 386
Splatting 306
96% 295 fps
CLim: 1630 MHz, MLim: 945 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.5.2
Lighting 339
Reflection 238
Parallax 532
96% 370 fps
MRender 187
Gravity 372
Splatting 298
93% 286 fps
CLim: 1630 MHz, MLim: 945 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.9.2
Lighting 320
Reflection 233
Parallax 563
94% 372 fps
MRender 187
Gravity 373
Splatting 296
93% 285 fps
32,164 MORE »

 Game FPS Estimates

Average fps @ 1080p with maximum detail settings for 11 popular games:

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive: 223 fps Fortnite: 122 fps PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds: 104 fps Grand Theft Auto V: 87 fps League of Legends: 188 fps Overwatch: 128 fps Battlefield 1: 97 fps The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt: 89 fps Minecraft: 214 fps World of Warcraft: 85 fps World of Tanks: 126 fps

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 20,238,293 GPUs tested.

 Popular Cards

Based on statistics from 32,164 user benchmarks.

Hardware Id Samples Bench ± SD Model / Price (Approx. $600 @ launch in Aug '17)
Sapphire(1DA2 E37F) 25% 98% ± 8%
Asus(1043 04C4) 21% 92% ± 8%
Asus RX Vega 64 8GB ROG Strix Gaming
ROG-STRIX-RXVEGA64-O8G-GAMING
EbayUS $54913 mins
AmazonUS $7004 days
AMD(1002 6B76) 18% 94% ± 7%
Gigabyte RX Vega 64 8GB
GV-RXVEGA64-8GD-B
EbayUS $79916 mins
AmazonUS $84917 months
XFX RX Vega 64 8GB
RX-VEGMTBFX6
Sapphire RX Vega 64 8GB
21275-02-20G
AMD(1002 0B36) 17% 94% ± 11%
MSI(1462 3680) 7% 95% ± 10%
MSI RX Vega 64 8GB Gaming Air Boost
RX VEGA 64 AIR BOOST 8G OC
AmazonUS $7161 month
Gigabyte(1458 2308) 7% 91% ± 11%
Gigabyte RX Vega 64 8GB Gaming OC
GV-RXVEGA64GAMING OC-8GD
AmazonUS $5008 mins
EbayUS $50013 mins
PowerColor(148C 2387) 3% 89% ± 13%
XFX(1682 9C10) 1% 98% ± 0%
Acer(1025 1246) 0% 70% ± 0%
Send price feedback
Typical RX Vega-64 Builds (Compare 16,482 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 95%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 113%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING - $180

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $1,073

Popular RX Vega-64 compatible motherboards:

How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.
Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) September 2019 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

Added 2 years ago.

Good

4 days ago.

genau


Poor

6 days ago.

dont buy as it has only one fan


Excellent

3 months ago.

Serves me well, can expect more performance if games use RPM feature of this card. It also out performs 1080 ti in production work that i do


Excellent

5 days ago.

помайнить сойдет, играть не очень.


Good

10 days ago.

Comparable performance to a GTX 1080 at 2/3 price


Excellent

27 days ago.

Spanked the 1080 so hard nvidia had to make a separate ray tracing processor in their 2080 to even get close to vega ray tracing.


Liked

2 months ago.

Comment 

vs. 1080: Worse performance, FAR higher power consumption, FAR higher thermal output, more expensive - literally no upside unless you have spent alot on a top-notch freesync monitor and can get the 64 at the same price as a 1080.—Oct '17


Good

5 months ago.

Mayor desempeño y poco calentamiento


Excellent

1 month ago.

Undervolt, overclock, get 2x8 GB 4000mhz ram for a Ryzen 9 and you're golden.


Good

1 day ago.

Solid card!


Excellent

2 months ago.

In games with new API (dx12, vulkan) it have better performance, than nVidia cads, that cost the same.


Terrible

2 months ago.

Finally, AMD have a good competitor to high end NVIDIA GPUs


Excellent

7 days ago.

d


Good

1 month ago.

Its epic


Excellent

3 months ago.

With better texture. Mos def, I am going for it this year


Excellent

25 days ago.

STRONGER THAN 1080 BUT HERE IS BELOW THAN 1070 :)))) ONLY SITE ON WORLD WITH SO POOR BENCHMARK


Good

1 month ago.

worth is its around 200 dollars cheaper than a 1080 and the performance is quite similar


Good

3 months ago.

Cheaper now out performs in some games


Good

2 years ago.


Poor

24 months ago.

Way too expensive. Please, buy a 1080 instead.


Excellent

3 months ago.

Really like what AMD did with this card.


Excellent

6 months ago.

If you're going to buy a Vega 64, do yourself a favor and buy a Sapphire Nitro+, PowerColor Red Devil, or Asus ROG Strix. As far as I can tell, those are just about the only three cards worth buying if you want some of the best performance Vega 64 has to offer. I have the Sapphire Nitro+ card and I would argue that it's the best Vega 64 on the market. I've run countless benchmarks with mine (not just here on UserBenchmark) and the results are almost consistently ahead of the GTX 1080/RTX 2070/Vega 64 Liquid pack and often approach the performance of the GTX 1080 Ti/RTX 2080/Radeon VII. If you buy a reference (blower style) card, you're probably not going to see results like those I mentioned above. At least, not without maxing the fan speed (creating a lot of noise) or installing a custom cooler or watercooling solution. The same can be said of most any reference card, whether AMD or Nvidia. At the prices these have been selling for recently (sub-$400 or even the $420 Sapphire Nitro+), they still offer great cost-to-performance, even when compared to Nvidia's recent competitive GPUs. It just depends what you're looking for, what you need, or who you pledge allegiance to (and there are a lot of you that only see green because the propaganda-filled marketing machine is unstoppable).


Excellent

3 months ago.

3333


Terrible

2 years ago.

Overpriced, cost as much as a 1080Ti ($699), uses too much power and poor performance for the money. Poor Vega.


Excellent

9 months ago.

Seriously powerful card stock. Underclock/overclock and you have a beast.


Terrible

9 months ago.

trash card


Excellent

23 months ago.

can some one help me overclock this card for mining my email is jsarrio@tulane.edu thanks


Excellent

19 months ago.

I was lucky to have bought it at 570€. I bought it because I hate nvidia's gimping (gameworks) and the extremely slow OpenCL performances on macOS (I sometimes use it on an Hackintosh). Best card I've ever tried! I use it in 1080p or 1400p virtual, and every game can be played at 60fps without any problem. At those resolutions it uses about 150-180W, and I'm happy with that.


Excellent

7 months ago.

Got it for 400 dollars and have been able to Undervolt and Overclock for a significant performance boost over stock. Love this card and I believe it is a great alternative for a 1080 and 2070 if you can find it for the right price.


Excellent

6 months ago.

Super solid card. No issues!


Excellent

4 months ago.

Vega 64 in crossfire will as of today (25/05/2019), out-bench and out-fps in 60% of games compared to a single 2080ti for 400$ cheaper, at the expense of power consumption and heat.


Excellent

3 months ago.

ich habe eine vega 64 nitro+ wirklich ein super gerät, entlich alles in 4k zocken


Excellent

3 months ago.

At first I was underwhelmed but the price was right. $250.00 cheaper than the 2070 was going to buy initially . After some over clocking, undervolting and bechmarking here and the valley I got it to runquite well. Way better than most. The numbers speak for themselves.


Excellent

3 months ago.

With a morpheus cooler and the right tweaking OOF


Excellent

2 months ago.

nice card ;) good performances in game and 3d work ;) overclocking capacity takes time but with good power we get very good performance well above the reference version and even compared to all versions custome (air or liquid).


Excellent

2 months ago.

undervolting works mint!


Your
opinion?
621 Graphics Cards (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list.

See how consistently different GPUs perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $140Nvidia GTX 1660 $220Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $70
Intel Core i5-9600K $225Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $275Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $80
Intel Core i7-9700K $360Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super) $429Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $230
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $75SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $799SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $64Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $83SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback