Average Bench: 120% (17th of 613)

Based on 22,614 user benchmarks.  Device: 1002 687F Models: Radeon(TM) RX Vega, Radeon RX Vega

The Radeon RX Vega 64 is AMD’s latest Radeon flagship graphics card. It is the first Vega based gaming GPU and follows on from the recent launch of the Vega Frontier Edition. The Vega architecture is built on 14 nm silicon and contains next-generation compute units (nCUs) that have been engineered to be more efficient and powerful than ever before, enabling gamers to achieve higher frame rates at 4K. Each NCU houses 64 steam processors, of which the Vega 64 has 4096 (compared to 3584 in the Vega 56) which can process up to 13.7 TFLOPS (0.6 TFLOPS more than the Frontier Edition) in the liquid cooled version of the GPU. The new architecture also employs 8GB of second generation high-bandwidth memory (HBM2) which is able cope with more data, more quickly than previously. AMD describe this as the most significant leap in their GPU architecture for the last five years. Our graphics benchmarks place the performance of the Vega 64 amongst the best. Its effective speed is very close to that of the twice as expensive Frontier Edition (a workstation GPU with a gaming mode) and just behind NVIDIA’s similarly priced, but now 1 year old GTX 1080. Despite the hopes of AMD enthusiasts, the great performance from the Vega 64 has not been able to exceed the even greater performance from NVIDIA’s GTX 1080 Ti, released earlier this year. The 33% faster 1080 Ti offers better value for money than an RX 64 would even if it were available at its list price of $599. The best prices for RX 64's today are closer to $750 making the RX 64 somewhat redundant until prices drop down to the low $500 mark. [Sep '17 GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Outstanding average bench

The AMD RX Vega 64 averaged 20.0% higher than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This is an excellent result which ranks the AMD RX Vega 64 near the top of the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy) 367fps
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat) 304fps

Poor consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the AMD RX Vega 64 is 63.1%. This is a particularly wide range which indicates that the AMD RX Vega 64 performs inconsistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot) 229fps
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere) 186fps
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 22,614 samples)
Min Avg Max
153 Lighting 304 374
183 Reflection 229 247
198 Parallax 530 632
119% 355 fps
Min Avg Max
170 MRender 186 196
199 Gravity 367 428
199 Splatting 287 310
120% 280 fps
User Benchmarks Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
The fastest GPU (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
XFX(1682 9C10) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1647 MHz, MLim: 1050 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.5.2
Lighting 369
Reflection 240
Parallax 605
141% 405 fps
MRender 191
Gravity 379
Splatting 302
125% 291 fps
AMD(1002 0B36) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1632 MHz, MLim: 1120 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.4.1
Lighting 315
Reflection 236
Parallax 618
131% 390 fps
MRender 189
Gravity 405
Splatting 299
129% 298 fps
CLim: 1630 MHz, MLim: 945 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.5.2
Lighting 324
Reflection 237
Parallax 602
132% 388 fps
MRender 188
Gravity 392
Splatting 298
126% 293 fps
Sapphire(1DA2 E37F) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1630 MHz, MLim: 945 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 17.12
Lighting 329
Reflection 235
Parallax 602
132% 389 fps
MRender 187
Gravity 373
Splatting 297
123% 286 fps
22,614 MORE »

 Game FPS Estimates

Average fps @ 1080p with maximum detail settings for 8 popular games:

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive: 223 fps Fortnite: 137 fps PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds: 104 fps Grand Theft Auto V: 89 fps League of Legends: 201 fps Overwatch: 131 fps The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt: 90 fps World of Tanks: 126 fps

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 17,047,259 GPUs tested.

 Popular Cards

Based on statistics from 22,614 user benchmarks.

Hardware Id Samples Bench ± SD Model / Price (Approx. $600 @ launch in Aug '17)
Sapphire(1DA2 E37F) 29% 123% ± 18%
Asus(1043 04C4) 28% 115% ± 20%
Asus RX Vega 64 8GB ROG Strix Gaming
ROG-STRIX-RXVEGA64-O8G-GAMING
AmazonUS $64421 mins
EbayUS $79632 mins
AMD(1002 6B76) 17% 119% ± 15%
Gigabyte RX Vega 64 8GB
GV-RXVEGA64-8GD-B
EbayUS $7992 mins
AmazonUS $84913 months
XFX RX Vega 64 8GB
RX-VEGMTBFX6
Sapphire RX Vega 64 8GB
21275-02-20G
AMD(1002 0B36) 16% 122% ± 16%
Gigabyte(1458 2308) 5% 122% ± 11%
Gigabyte RX Vega 64 8GB Gaming OC
GV-RXVEGA64GAMING OC-8GD
AmazonUS $4002 days
EbayUS $40032 mins
MSI(1462 3680) 3% 127% ± 6%
MSI RX Vega 64 8GB Gaming Air Boost
RX VEGA 64 AIR BOOST 8G OC
NeweggUS $5502 months
AmazonUS $60021 mins
PowerColor(148C 2387) 1% 132% ± 3%
Acer(1025 1246) 1% 93% ± 1%
XFX(1682 9C10) 0% 101% ± 0%
Send price feedback
Typical RX Vega 64 Builds (Compare 11,156 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 114%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 131%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 126%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING - $187

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 144% - Outstanding Total price: $1,115

Popular RX Vega 64 compatible motherboards:

How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.
Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) May 2019 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

Added 21 months ago.

Good (edit your comment) Add link

1 day ago.

Awesome price to performance.


Good

3 days ago.

00


Excellent

6 months ago.

Serves me well, can expect more performance if games use RPM feature of this card. It also out performs 1080 ti in production work that i do


Poor

15 days ago.

Stock setting overheat WAY too easy and gernally heating issues make this card more hasssle that it's worth


Excellent

5 days ago.

Пользуюсь сейчас данной картой в исполнении от Sapphire. Сказать что я крайне доволен - ничего не сказать. +- такая же производительность, как и у конкурента в лице 1080, но цена ощутимо ниже. Карта сильно подняла в моих глазах решения от AMD.


Good

17 days ago.

Comparable performance to a GTX 1080 at 2/3 price


Good

1 month ago.

Spanked the 1080 so hard nvidia had to make a separate ray tracing processor in their 2080 to even get close to vega ray tracing.


Excellent

25 days ago.

i have it

Comment 

vs. 1080: Worse performance, FAR higher power consumption, FAR higher thermal output, more expensive - literally no upside unless you have spent alot on a top-notch freesync monitor and can get the 64 at the same price as a 1080.—Oct '17


Good

1 month ago.

Mayor desempeño y poco calentamiento


Excellent

4 days ago.

In games with new API (dx12, vulkan) it have better performance, than nVidia cads, that cost the same.


Excellent

1 month ago.

to much power use and it is hotttttt


Excellent

4 months ago.

Finally, AMD have a good competitor to high end NVIDIA GPUs


Terrible

15 days ago.

I like it but the card is not optimated for games thats bother me but i will buy this one, but the custom deisgn


Excellent

1 month ago.

Delivers good performance for a better price. Hugely impressive bus-width at 2048 bit! Cool LED lighting with the NITRO+ from Sapphire. The difference is most noticeable in games that are not sponsored and biased towards nVidia.


Excellent

1 month ago.

amd nvidia


Excellent

2 months ago.

STRONGER THAN 1080 BUT HERE IS BELOW THAN 1070 :)))) ONLY SITE ON WORLD WITH SO POOR BENCHMARK


Terrible

14 days ago.

trash


Good

2 months ago.

Cheaper now out performs in some games


Good

20 months ago.


Poor

20 months ago.

Way too expensive. Please, buy a 1080 instead.


Excellent

2 months ago.

If you're going to buy a Vega 64, do yourself a favor and buy a Sapphire Nitro+, PowerColor Red Devil, or Asus ROG Strix. As far as I can tell, those are just about the only three cards worth buying if you want some of the best performance Vega 64 has to offer. I have the Sapphire Nitro+ card and I would argue that it's the best Vega 64 on the market. I've run countless benchmarks with mine (not just here on UserBenchmark) and the results are almost consistently ahead of the GTX 1080/RTX 2070/Vega 64 Liquid pack and often approach the performance of the GTX 1080 Ti/RTX 2080/Radeon VII. If you buy a reference (blower style) card, you're probably not going to see results like those I mentioned above. At least, not without maxing the fan speed (creating a lot of noise) or installing a custom cooler or watercooling solution. The same can be said of most any reference card, whether AMD or Nvidia. At the prices these have been selling for recently (sub-$400 or even the $420 Sapphire Nitro+), they still offer great cost-to-performance, even when compared to Nvidia's recent competitive GPUs. It just depends what you're looking for, what you need, or who you pledge allegiance to (and there are a lot of you that only see green because the propaganda-filled marketing machine is unstoppable).


Terrible

20 months ago.

Overpriced, cost as much as a 1080Ti ($699), uses too much power and poor performance for the money. Poor Vega.


Excellent

5 months ago.

Seriously powerful card stock. Underclock/overclock and you have a beast.


Terrible

5 months ago.

trash card


Excellent

19 months ago.

can some one help me overclock this card for mining my email is jsarrio@tulane.edu thanks


Excellent

15 months ago.

I was lucky to have bought it at 570€. I bought it because I hate nvidia's gimping (gameworks) and the extremely slow OpenCL performances on macOS (I sometimes use it on an Hackintosh). Best card I've ever tried! I use it in 1080p or 1400p virtual, and every game can be played at 60fps without any problem. At those resolutions it uses about 150-180W, and I'm happy with that.


Excellent

3 months ago.

Got it for 400 dollars and have been able to Undervolt and Overclock for a significant performance boost over stock. Love this card and I believe it is a great alternative for a 1080 and 2070 if you can find it for the right price.


Excellent

2 months ago.

Super solid card. No issues!


Excellent

21 hrs ago.

Vega 64 in crossfire will as of today (25/05/2019), out-bench and out-fps in 60% of games compared to a single 2080ti for 400$ cheaper, at the expense of power consumption and heat.


Your
opinion?
613 Graphics Cards (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list.

See how consistently different GPUs perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $356Nvidia GTX 1070 $380Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $70
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 $139Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $208Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $99
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $108Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti $808Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $93
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $90SanDisk Extreme 64GB $128
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $41G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $651SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $95SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback