Average Bench: 117% (11th of 596)

Based on 6,621 user benchmarks.  Device: 1002 687F Models: Radeon(TM) RX Vega, Radeon RX Vega

The Radeon RX Vega 64 is AMD’s latest Radeon flagship graphics card. It is the first Vega based gaming GPU and follows on from the recent launch of the Vega Frontier Edition. The Vega architecture is built on 14 nm silicon and contains next-generation compute units (nCUs) that have been engineered to be more efficient and powerful than ever before, enabling gamers to achieve higher frame rates at 4K. Each NCU houses 64 steam processors, of which the Vega 64 has 4096 (compared to 3584 in the Vega 56) which can process up to 13.7 TFLOPS (0.6 TFLOPS more than the Frontier Edition) in the liquid cooled version of the GPU. The new architecture also employs 8GB of second generation high-bandwidth memory (HBM2) which is able cope with more data, more quickly than previously. AMD describe this as the most significant leap in their GPU architecture for the last five years. Our graphics benchmarks place the performance of the Vega 64 amongst the best. Its effective speed is very close to that of the twice as expensive Frontier Edition (a workstation GPU with a gaming mode) and just behind NVIDIA’s similarly priced, but now 1 year old GTX 1080. Despite the hopes of AMD enthusiasts, the great performance from the Vega 64 has not been able to exceed the even greater performance from NVIDIA’s GTX 1080 Ti, released earlier this year. The 33% faster 1080 Ti offers better value for money than an RX 64 would even if it were available at its list price of $599. The best prices for RX 64's today are closer to $750 making the RX 64 somewhat redundant until prices drop down to the low $500 mark. [Sep '17 GPUPro]


Outstanding average bench

The AMD RX Vega 64 averaged 17.1% higher than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This is an excellent result which ranks the AMD RX Vega 64 near the top of the comparison list.


Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy) 345fps
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat) 301fps

Below average consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the AMD RX Vega 64 is 57.3%. This is a relatively wide range which indicates that the AMD RX Vega 64 performs inconsistently under varying real world conditions.


Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot) 229fps
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere) 184fps

Average Bench

(Based on 6,621 samples)
Min Avg Max
81.4 Lighting 301 366
193 Reflection 229 243
200 Parallax 524 621
118% 351 fps
Min Avg Max
173 MRender 184 193
200 Gravity 345 398
199 Splatting 287 306
116% 272 fps
User Benchmarks Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
The fastest GPU (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
CLim: 1630 MHz, MLim: 945 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 18.10.2
Lighting 334
Reflection 239
Parallax 596
133% 390 fps
MRender 188
Gravity 369
Splatting 302
123% 286 fps
CLim: 1622 MHz, MLim: 1050 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 18.10.2
Lighting 339
Reflection 239
Parallax 552
129% 376 fps
MRender 189
Gravity 358
Splatting 301
121% 283 fps
Device(1DA2 E37F) ≥ 4GB; sapphire vega 64 nitro+
CLim: 1630 MHz, MLim: 945 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 18.11.1
Lighting 249
Reflection 236
Parallax 590
115% 359 fps
MRender 187
Gravity 373
Splatting 300
123% 287 fps
CLim: 1630 MHz, MLim: 945 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 18.10.2
Lighting 241
Reflection 226
Parallax 498
103% 322 fps
MRender 181
Gravity 348
Splatting 287
116% 272 fps
6,621 MORE »

 Game FPS Estimates

Average fps @ 1080p with maximum detail settings for 2 popular games:

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive: 221 fps Overwatch: 125 fps

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 12,045,760 GPUs tested.

 Popular Cards

Based on statistics from 6,621 user benchmarks.

Hardware Id Samples Bench ± SD Model / Price (Approx. $600 @ launch in Aug '17)
AMD(1002 6B76) 30% 117% ± 16%
Gigabyte RX Vega 64 8GB
EbayUS $79921 mins
AmazonUS $8497 months
XFX RX Vega 64 8GB
Sapphire RX Vega 64 8GB
Asus(1043 04C4) 22% 115% ± 19%
Asus RX Vega 64 8GB ROG Strix Gaming
AmazonUS $64811 mins
EbayUS $75517 mins
Device(1DA2 E37F) 19% 121% ± 15%
AMD(1002 0B36) 11% 117% ± 21%
Gigabyte(1458 2308) 8% 115% ± 16%
Gigabyte RX Vega 64 8GB Gaming OC
AmazonUS $5308 days
EbayUS $76717 mins
PowerColor(148C 2387) 7% 121% ± 12%
MSI(1462 3680) 2% 116% ± 20%
Acer(1025 1246) 0% 93% ± 0%
Send price feedback
Typical RX Vega 64 Builds (Compare 10,824 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming 107%
Desktop 106%
Workstation 110%

Motherboard: Asus CROSSHAIR VI HERO - $173

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 104% - Outstanding Total price: $1,175

Popular RX Vega 64 compatible motherboards:

How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.
Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2018 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]


Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.


Added 15 months ago.

Good (edit your comment) Add link

4 hrs ago.

Cam on grate card dot understand way is sow below market geforce nvidia they must have big monopoly lol . anyway card is rocking and it will last for few good years and more kk....


7 days ago.

Serves me well, can expect more performance if games use RPM feature of this card. It also out performs 1080 ti in production work that i do


25 days ago.

ЛОЖЬ! наглая ЛОЖЬ! 1080 начинается от 50 000 руб в ценах!


1 hr ago.

I like but it is a little to expensive. In comparison a Nvidia graphics card with the same price is a bit faster. But with vega you can use Free-Sync so you can save some monex there.


1 month ago.

I hate miners so much. This gpu should cost no more than 500 euro but it costs 800. I hate miners so much.


2 days ago.


vs. 1080: Worse performance, FAR higher power consumption, FAR higher thermal output, more expensive - literally no upside unless you have spent alot on a top-notch freesync monitor and can get the 64 at the same price as a 1080.—Oct '17


1 month ago.

Mayor desempeño y poco calentamiento


13 days ago.

In games with new API (dx12, vulkan) it have better performance, than nVidia cads, that cost the same.


1 day ago.

to much power use and it is hotttttt


14 days ago.

I like it but the card is not optimated for games thats bother me but i will buy this one, but the custom deisgn


13 days ago.



14 months ago.


13 months ago.

Way too expensive. Please, buy a 1080 instead.


14 months ago.

Overpriced, cost as much as a 1080Ti ($699), uses too much power and poor performance for the money. Poor Vega.


13 months ago.

can some one help me overclock this card for mining my email is jsarrio@tulane.edu thanks


8 months ago.

I was lucky to have bought it at 570€. I bought it because I hate nvidia's gimping (gameworks) and the extremely slow OpenCL performances on macOS (I sometimes use it on an Hackintosh). Best card I've ever tried! I use it in 1080p or 1400p virtual, and every game can be played at 60fps without any problem. At those resolutions it uses about 150-180W, and I'm happy with that.

Reaching its prime
Age: 15 months

Speed Comparisons

vs Nvidia GTX 1070
vs Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB
vs AMD RX 480
vs Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti
vs Nvidia GTX 1080
vs Nvidia GTX 970
vs AMD RX 580
vs Nvidia GTX 980 Ti
vs AMD RX 470

596 Graphics Cards (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list.

See how consistently different GPUs perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
Intel Core i7-8700K $359Nvidia GTX 1070 $330Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $85
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $130Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $243Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $102
Intel Core i5-8600K $237AMD RX 480 $280Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $163
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $130SanDisk Extreme 64GB $43
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $869SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $130SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback