Today's hottest deals

Positivo C14CR21

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 21%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.94% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (73%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemPositivo C14CR21  (all builds)
MotherboardPositivo C14CR21
Memory0.7 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120921
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 26 '20 at 11:54
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 73%

 PC Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron B800
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
47.2% Average
Memory 81.9
1-Core 39.6
2-Core 66.5
44% 62.7 Pts
4-Core 76.6
8-Core 79.3
10% 77.9 Pts
64-Core 79.4
5% 79.4 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 47.2%
Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (G2 Pentium/Celeron 1.1/1.15 GHz)
Device(1297 2027) 997MB
Driver: igdumd32.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4229
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
0.94% Terrible
Lighting 0.9
Reflection 1.2
Parallax 1
1% 1.03 fps
MRender 1.5
Gravity 1
Splatting 2.2
1% 1.57 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.94%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST250LM0 04 HN-M250MBB 250GB
216GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2AR1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 100 96 87 96 100 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
55.8% Above average
Read 101
Write 102
Mixed 54
SusWrite 93.2
64% 87.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 56%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 76.A346G.C270C 1x2GB
1 of 4 slots used
2GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
27.5% Poor
MC Read 9.2
MC Write 9
MC Mixed 8.2
25% 8.8 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 8.3
SC Mixed 7.7
23% 8 GB/s
Latency 77.1
52% 77.1 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 27.5%
Great: 27%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical C14CR21 Builds (Compare 54 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Positivo C14CR21

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback