Gigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Ultra Gaming Pro-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 110%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 124%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics134% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive233% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemGigabyte X299 AORUS Ultra Gaming Pro
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Ultra Gaming Pro-CF  (all builds)
Memory50.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.6 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191128
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 27 '20 at 04:45
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-7920X-$250
, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
78.9% Very good
Memory 71
1-Core 133
2-Core 259
83% 154 Pts
4-Core 464
8-Core 907
81% 686 Pts
64-Core 1,826
113% 1,826 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 78.9%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,135
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4875 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 457.30
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
134% Outstanding
Lighting 152
Reflection 204
Parallax 300
124% 219 fps
MRender 304
Gravity 217
Splatting 162
179% 228 fps
Poor: 185%
This bench: 134%
Great: 230%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZPLL1T6HAJQ-00005 1.5TB
556GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GPJA2B3Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1752 1786 1762 1760 1566 1668 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
233% Outstanding
Read 1,274
Write 1,678
Mixed 1,016
SusWrite 1,716
322% 1,421 MB/s
4K Read 22.3
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 32.1
129% 52 MB/s
DQ Read 1,012
DQ Write 715
DQ Mixed 852
639% 859 MB/s
Poor: 233%
This bench: 233%
Great: 315%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8x8GB
8 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
118% Outstanding
MC Read 44.1
MC Write 58.7
MC Mixed 42.6
138% 48.5 GB/s
SC Read 6.7
SC Write 20.1
SC Mixed 9.9
35% 12.2 GB/s
Latency 99
40% 99 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 118%
Great: 142%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X299 AORUS Ultra Gaming Pro-CF Builds (Compare 108 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 85%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 85%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Ultra Gaming Pro-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 106% - Outstanding Total price: $390
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback