Asrock H61M-DGS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics23.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive28.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock H61M-DGS  (all builds)
Memory8.5 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120907
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateDec 03 '20 at 20:26
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-2120-$73
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
56.3% Above average
Memory 75
1-Core 87.1
2-Core 148
62% 103 Pts
4-Core 220
8-Core 218
29% 219 Pts
64-Core 218
14% 218 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 56.3%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
Asus(1043 8616) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 457.30
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
23.8% Poor
Lighting 33.5
Reflection 34.5
Parallax 33
27% 33.7 fps
MRender 37.5
Gravity 33.9
Splatting 0.3
17% 23.9 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 23.8%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$32
161GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z32080RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 78 76 57 82 70 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
28.1% Poor
Read 192
Write 60.1
Mixed 13.5
SusWrite 80.1
19% 86.4 MB/s
4K Read 13.1
4K Write 42.5
4K Mixed 4.3
48% 20 MB/s
DQ Read 14.4
DQ Write 80.4
DQ Mixed 13.4
20% 36.1 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 28.1%
Great: 86%
Toshiba MD03ACA300V 3TB
976GB free
Firmware: FL2V
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 120 123 122 123 124 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
78.2% Very good
Read 150
Write 145
Mixed 64.6
SusWrite 122
88% 120 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 0.9
185% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 78.2%
Great: 93%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown FLFF65F-D8KQ9 Kingston 99U5471-052.A00LF 12GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
47.5% Average
MC Read 17.1
MC Write 16.8
MC Mixed 15.3
47% 16.4 GB/s
SC Read 14.2
SC Write 15.9
SC Mixed 15.3
43% 15.1 GB/s
Latency 90.4
44% 90.4 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 47.5%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H61M-DGS Builds (Compare 1,049 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock H61M-DGS - $68

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $155
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback