Today's hottest deals

Asus K30AD_M31AD_M51AD

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive85.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus K30AD_M31AD_M51AD  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK K30AD_M31AD_M51AD_M32AD
Memory5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150803
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 05 '20 at 22:12
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User UKR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-4170-$40
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
64.7% Good
Memory 79.7
1-Core 110
2-Core 186
73% 125 Pts
4-Core 289
8-Core 292
39% 290 Pts
64-Core 294
18% 294 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 64.7%
Great: 69%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSDPR-CX400-256 256GB
110GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 311 253 44 85 66 95 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
85.8% Excellent
Read 453
Write 303
Mixed 328
SusWrite 142
68% 307 MB/s
4K Read 38.2
4K Write 82
4K Mixed 40
152% 53.4 MB/s
DQ Read 262
DQ Write 291
DQ Mixed 22
87% 192 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 85.8%
Great: 90%
Samsung HD200HJ 200GB
67GB free
Firmware: KF100-06
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 93 91 92 93 94 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
52.6% Above average
Read 90.3
Write 96.1
Mixed 57.3
SusWrite 92.8
62% 84.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
158% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 52.6%
Great: 53%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2010)-$25
58GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 84 79 80 84 85 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
39.5% Below average
Read 55.2
Write 53.7
Mixed 39.8
SusWrite 82.2
42% 57.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
117% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 39.5%
Great: 50%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5273DH0-CK0 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
58.8% Above average
MC Read 20.9
MC Write 22.3
MC Mixed 17.8
58% 20.3 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 20.4
SC Mixed 20.3
56% 19.5 GB/s
Latency 81.1
49% 81.1 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 58.8%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical K30AD_M31AD_M51AD Builds (Compare 2,258 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Asus K30AD_M31AD_M51AD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Good Total price: $303
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback