Today's hottest deals

Asus Z97-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics55.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive93.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus Z97-A  (all builds)
Memory6.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140711
Uptime2 Days
Run DateMay 10 '17 at 04:13
Run Duration186 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 28%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4690K-$43
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
82% Excellent
Memory 90.5
1-Core 112
2-Core 234
82% 146 Pts
4-Core 424
8-Core 436
57% 430 Pts
64-Core 443
27% 443 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 82%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1546 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 381.65
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
55.1% Above average
Lighting 70.7
Reflection 70.1
Parallax 63
58% 67.9 fps
MRender 64.1
Gravity 65.3
Splatting 56.3
50% 61.9 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 55.1%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX100 500GB-$49
15GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU02 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
93.4% Outstanding
Read 503
Write 430
Mixed 455
103% 463 MB/s
4K Read 29.8
4K Write 99.1
4K Mixed 28.2
134% 52.4 MB/s
DQ Read 30.3
DQ Write 287
DQ Mixed 23.6
58% 114 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 93.4%
Great: 108%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$60
540GB free
Firmware: 05.00K05 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
53.7% Above average
Read 99.8
Write 86.9
Mixed 89.4
69% 92.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.63
4K Write 2.09
4K Mixed 0.34
103% 1.02 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 53.7%
Great: 76%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$60
462GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
80.5% Excellent
Read 156
Write 124
Mixed 127
102% 136 MB/s
4K Read 1.16
4K Write 2.61
4K Mixed 0.48
150% 1.41 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 80.5%
Great: 76%
Multi-Reader -0 2GB
1GB free, PID 6368
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
18.3% Very poor
Read 45.4
Write 35.8
Mixed 29.4
45% 36.9 MB/s
4K Read 15.4
4K Write 0.09
4K Mixed 0.1
64% 5.19 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 18.3%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
31.1% Below average
MC Read 10
MC Write 10.4
MC Mixed 9.1
28% 9.83 GB/s
SC Read 8.9
SC Write 9.9
SC Mixed 9.4
27% 9.4 GB/s
Latency 66.5
60% 66.5 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 31.1%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z97-A Builds (Compare 5,225 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus Z97-A - $150

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $798
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback