Today's hottest deals

Intel SpringDale-G

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 11%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 23.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.75% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardIntel SpringDale-G  (all builds)
Memory1.5 GB free of 2 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20041101
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 07 '20 at 12:36
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 23%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron 2.40GHz
mPGA478, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
23.6% Poor
Memory 44.3
1-Core 18.6
2-Core 18.2
21% 27 Pts
4-Core 19.1
8-Core 19.1
2% 19.1 Pts
64-Core 18.8
1% 18.8 Pts
Poor: 3%
This bench: 23.6%
Great: 24%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 7300 GT
MSI(1462 0641) 256MB
Ram: 256MB, Driver: 309.08
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
0.75% Terrible
Lighting 1.4
Reflection 1.3
Parallax 0.3
1% 1 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.75%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB-$34
450GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 66 61 33 90 97 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
25.4% Poor
Read 19.3
Write 31.9
Mixed 22.3
SusWrite 69.3
26% 35.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.5
77% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 25.4%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x1GB
2 of 4 slots used
2GB DIMM SDRAM
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
9.68% Terrible
MC Read 3.6
MC Write 2.4
MC Mixed 2.7
8% 2.9 GB/s
SC Read 3.6
SC Write 2.7
SC Mixed 3.2
9% 3.17 GB/s
Latency 183
22% 183 ns
Poor: 6%
This bench: 9.68%
Great: 20%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SpringDale-G Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

Motherboard: Intel SpringDale-G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $15
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $330
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback