Today's hottest deals

Asus M2N-E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 33%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.22% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive18.2% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus M2N-E  (all builds)
Memory2.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100323
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 27 '21 at 14:19
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom X3 8450
Socket AM2 , 1 CPU, 3 cores, 3 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
36% Below average
Memory 55.2
1-Core 33.7
2-Core 66.7
34% 51.9 Pts
4-Core 99.5
8-Core 100
13% 99.8 Pts
64-Core 99.7
6% 99.7 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 36%
Great: 46%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 7300 GT
Asus(1043 820E) 256MB
Ram: 256MB, Driver: 309.08
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.22% Terrible
Lighting 0.4
Reflection 1.2
Parallax 0.2
0% 0.6 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.22%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ct240bx5 0 240GB
144GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 128 118 87 25 90 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
18.2% Very poor
Read 126
Write 102
Mixed 107
SusWrite 94.5
24% 107 MB/s
4K Read 8.9
4K Write 7.4
4K Mixed 5.6
25% 7.3 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 18.2%
Great: 87%
Samsung HD321KJ 320GB-$42
258GB free
Firmware: CP10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 78 78 77 78 78 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
41.6% Average
Read 67
Write 78.4
Mixed 45.7
SusWrite 77.7
49% 67.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
140% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 41.6%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
25.6% Poor
MC Read 11.3
MC Write 5.8
MC Mixed 10.6
26% 9.23 GB/s
SC Read 5.9
SC Write 4.6
SC Mixed 6.6
16% 5.7 GB/s
Latency 142
28% 142 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 25.6%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M2N-E Builds (Compare 40 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M2N-E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 22% - Poor Total price: $152
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback