Asus F1A75-V

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive	37.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus F1A75-V (all builds)
Memory	10.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140530
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Dec 10 '20 at 19:32
Run Duration	182 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	8%

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon II X4 651 1,008 User benchmarks, average bench 50% FM1 , 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	56.2% Above average	Memory 80.4 1-Core 48 2-Core 95.1 48% 74.5 Pts	4-Core 188 8-Core 190 25% 189 Pts	64-Core 186 12% 186 Pts
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 56.2% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 480 GB 480GB 8,604 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 47GB free (System drive) Firmware: UG4500RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 184 2.4 2.7 41 2.5 3 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	37.5% Below average	Read 445 Write 344 Mixed 279 SusWrite 39.2 62% 277 MB/s	4K Read 11.5 4K Write 12.7 4K Mixed 14.5 43% 12.9 MB/s	DQ Read 116 DQ Write 51.1 DQ Mixed 44.9 44% 70.7 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 37.5% Great: 57%
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35 176,713 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 33GB free Firmware: 60AABBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 133 121 124 95 112 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	54.2% Above average	Read 220 Write 202 Mixed 213 SusWrite 122 42% 189 MB/s	4K Read 19.5 4K Write 65 4K Mixed 25.7 97% 36.7 MB/s	DQ Read 166 DQ Write 202 DQ Mixed 161 128% 176 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 54.2% Great: 85%
Seagate ST1000LM048-2E7172 1TB 89,596 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 11GB free Firmware: SDM1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 74 61 55 55 77 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	44% Average	Read 89.2 Write 107 Mixed 101 SusWrite 63.4 67% 90.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 3 4K Mixed 0.8 182% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 44% Great: 71%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 16GB 13,169 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 8GB free, PID 1665 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 2 2.8 2.5 2.5 2.2 2.4 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	3.91% Terrible	Read 17.8 Write 1.7 Mixed 4.3 SusWrite 2.4 6% 6.55 MB/s	4K Read 3.4 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 13% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.91% Great: 8%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 4x4GB 17,012 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	42.7% Average	MC Read 17.5 MC Write 15 MC Mixed 14.2 44% 15.6 GB/s	SC Read 7.6 SC Write 6.7 SC Mixed 10.3 23% 8.2 GB/s	Latency 79.8 50% 79.8 ns
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 42.7% Great: 73%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical F1A75-V Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 48%

Yacht

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus F1A75-V

CPU
A8-3870 APUAMD $81Bench 47%, 6,332 samples	2x
A4-3400 APUAMD $80Bench 36%, 2,796 samples	1x
A6-3650 APUAMDBench 44%, 2,748 samples	1x

GPU
GeForce GTS 250NvidiaBench 7%, 14,881 samples	1x
R9 270XAMD $199Bench 27%, 77,943 samples	1x
Radeon HD 6410DAMDBench 2%, 3,128 samples	1x

SSD
TOSHIBA-TR200 240GBBench 71%, 36,832 samples	1x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	1x

RAM
RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBG.SKILLBench 53%, 47,852 samples	1x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	1x
M378B5273DH0-CK0 M378B5273DH0-CK0 M378B5273EB0-CK0 M378B5273DH0-CK0 16GBSamsungBench 53%, 13 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 66% - Good

Total price: $81

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16