Lenovo 30ATA02LLM

Performance Results


Gaming 34% Sail boat	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 28% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	44.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	96.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Lenovo 30ATA02LLM (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO 30C0
Memory	50.8 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20201116
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Dec 19 '20 at 22:44
Run Duration	295 Seconds
Run User	MEX-User
Background CPU	26%

PC Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E3-1280 v5 88 User benchmarks, average bench 79% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	64.4% Good	Memory 70.8 1-Core 99.5 2-Core 186 67% 119 Pts	4-Core 314 8-Core 446 48% 380 Pts	64-Core 366 23% 366 Pts
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 64.4% Great: 88%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P2200 5,007 User benchmarks, average bench 47% Nvidia(10DE 131B) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1746 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 5GB, Driver: 460.89 Performing below potential (25^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	44.9% Average	Lighting 51.7 Reflection 56.8 Parallax 55.8 42% 54.8 fps	MRender 67.8 Gravity 54.6 Splatting 62.3 50% 61.6 fps
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 44.9% Great: 49%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba OCZ RD400 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$70 2,931 User benchmarks, average bench 185% 161GB free (System drive) Firmware: 57CZ4102 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 326 227 239 214 229 250 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	96.2% Outstanding	Read 1,039 Write 300 Mixed 857 SusWrite 247 135% 611 MB/s	4K Read 28.4 4K Write 59.2 4K Mixed 10.6 88% 32.7 MB/s	DQ Read 451 DQ Write 209 DQ Mixed 281 221% 314 MB/s
Poor: 116% ↑ This bench: 96.2% Great: 242%
Samsung 860 EVO M.2 1TB 27,887 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 662GB free Firmware: RVT04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 345 370 392 397 402 415 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	94.9% Outstanding	Read 451 Write 420 Mixed 409 SusWrite 387 94% 417 MB/s	4K Read 31.7 4K Write 53.2 4K Mixed 40.8 128% 41.9 MB/s	DQ Read 367 DQ Write 214 DQ Mixed 270 207% 284 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 94.9% Great: 133%
Samsung 860 EVO M.2 1TB 27,887 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 688GB free Firmware: RVT24B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 563 780 470 468 469 469 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 81% Great: 133%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$67 235,501 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 1.5TB free Firmware: CC24 SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 148 157 148 148 162 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	91.2% Outstanding	Read 168 Write 176 Mixed 67.1 SusWrite 150 102% 140 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.8 139% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 91.2% Great: 113%
Seagate Backup+ BK 1TB 2,418 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 0GB free Firmware: 0836 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 64 Write 12.2 Mixed 28.2 26% 34.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.5 83% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 14% Great: 58%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB 15,101 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 658GB free, PID a200 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 104 102 105 103 103 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	41% Average	Read 89.3 Write 95.8 Mixed 36.6 SusWrite 103 109% 81.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.5 80% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 41% Great: 44%
TOSHIBA THNSNJ128GCST 128GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 145% 33GB free, PID 6388 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 136 141 154 149 156 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	156% Outstanding	Read 359 Write 183 Mixed 209 SusWrite 144 275% 224 MB/s	4K Read 15.2 4K Write 22.3 4K Mixed 19 1,461% 18.8 MB/s	DQ Read 21.6 DQ Write 37.8 DQ Mixed 17.3 1,954% 25.6 MB/s
Poor: 119% ↑ This bench: 156% Great: 167%
SDHC Card 32GB 13,791 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 29GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.4 3.1 3.2 3.3 4 5.2 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	4.6% Terrible	Read 20.9 Write 2.2 Mixed 5.2 SusWrite 3.5 8% 7.95 MB/s	4K Read 3.4 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 13% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 4.6% Great: 33%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x16GB 9,153 User benchmarks, average bench 98% 4 of 4 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	63.8% Good	MC Read 23 MC Write 24.4 MC Mixed 21.4 66% 22.9 GB/s	SC Read 13.4 SC Write 24.1 SC Mixed 19.9 55% 19.1 GB/s	Latency 99.6 40% 99.6 ns
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 63.8% Great: 140%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Lenovo 30ATA02LLM

Performance Results

PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)