PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 39.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 80.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus SABERTOOTH P67 (all builds) |
Memory | 10.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20121101 |
Uptime | 3.7 Days |
Run Date | Dec 26 '20 at 14:51 |
Run Duration | 137 Seconds |
Run User | BEL-User |
Background CPU | 56% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
60.6%
Good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD RX 480-$75
Asus(1043 0501) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1300 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.12.1
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
39.8%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
409GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 299 398 441 447 462 461 MB/s
|
80.3%
Excellent
|
|||
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130
390GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 411 445 443 449 464 462 MB/s
|
111%
Outstanding
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston 99U5471-066.A00LF 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
|
30.6%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-2600KIntel $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples | 577x |
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples | 233x |
Core i7-2600Intel $192Bench 67%, 185,630 samples | 129x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 106x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 101x |
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 79x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 59% - Above average | Total price: $599 |