Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

TEST
YOUR PC

ADD TO PC
BUILD

Casper Excalibur G5K

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 55% Yacht	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	12.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (67%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Casper Excalibur G5K (all builds)
Motherboard	Casper Excalibur G5K
Memory	10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160707
Uptime	0.5 Days
Run Date	Jan 05 '21 at 16:55
Run Duration	126 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	67%

PC Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6700HQ 320,434 User benchmarks, average bench 59% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	54.6% Above average	Memory 71.2 1-Core 67.6 2-Core 121 53% 86.7 Pts	4-Core 206 8-Core 342 34% 274 Pts	64-Core 347 22% 347 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 54.6% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960M 73,363 User benchmarks, average bench 16% Clevo(1558 1502) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 460.89 Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	12.2% Very poor	Lighting 14.1 Reflection 23.9 Parallax 13.2 12% 17.1 fps	MRender 22.2 Gravity 14.3 Splatting 14.7 14% 17.1 fps
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 12.2% Great: 18%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 120GB-$100 20,420 User benchmarks, average bench 93% 12GB free (System drive) Firmware: MAT01B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 416 Write 402 Mixed 310 84% 376 MB/s	4K Read 24.3 4K Write 47.6 4K Mixed 30 100% 34 MB/s	DQ Read 379 DQ Write 337 DQ Mixed 312 247% 343 MB/s
Poor: 65% Great: 110%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100M 1TB 6,695 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 419GB free Firmware: AX1P1A SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 94 95 94 93 91 MB/s Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	55% Above average	Read 98.4 Write 97 Mixed 32.8 SusWrite 93.2 58% 80.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.6 119% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 55% Great: 61%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT8G4SFS8213.C8FAD1 2x8GB 273 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	51.9% Above average	MC Read 21 MC Write 19 MC Mixed 17.4 55% 19.1 GB/s	SC Read 9.8 SC Write 15 SC Mixed 11.5 35% 12.1 GB/s	Latency 98.7 40% 98.7 ns
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 51.9% Great: 73%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Excalibur G5K Builds (Compare 71 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 17%

Surfboard

Desktop 65%

Destroyer

Workstation 15%

Tree trunk

System: Casper Excalibur G5K

CPU
Core i7-6700HQIntelBench 59%, 320,434 samples	71x

GPU
GTX 960MNvidiaBench 16%, 73,363 samples	38x
HD 530 (Mobile Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 213,495 samples	33x

SSD
MZNLF128HCHP-00000 128GBSamsungBench 47%, 6,038 samples	27x
MZNLN256HMHQ-00000 256GBSamsungBench 96%, 10,917 samples	4x
S3 500G 500GBSandiskBench 92%, 12,292 samples	2x

RAM
CT8G4SFD8213.C16FBD1 2x8GBCrucialBench 73%, 670 samples	39x
CT8G4SFS8213.C8FAD1 2x8GBCrucialBench 66%, 273 samples	17x
CT8G4SFS8213.M8FA 2x8GBCrucialBench 66%, 199 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400