bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 6.46%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced. Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardMicrosoft Virtual Machine
Memory0.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191217
Uptime9.7 Days
Run DateJan 13 '21 at 17:31
Run Duration276 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon Silver 4108
None, 2 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.85 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
6.46% Terrible
Memory 6.83
1-Core 53.3
2-Core 34.8
18% 31.6 Pts
4-Core 33.3
8-Core 45.1
5% 39.2 Pts
64-Core 48.9
3% 48.9 Pts
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.46%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Microsoft Virtual Disk 86GB
18GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 45 47 42 41 43 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 11% Great: 92%
Microsoft Virtual Disk 43GB
36GB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 40 42 46 43 46 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 8% Great: 94%
Microsoft Virtual Disk 11GB
6GB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 58 59 64 63 56 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 19% Great: 73%
Microsoft Virtual Disk 537GB
453GB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 54 59 60 60 51 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
42.5% Average
Read 93.5
Write 54.5
Mixed 65
SusWrite 54.7
50% 66.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.6
113% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 42.5%
Great: 93%
Microsoft Virtual Disk 108GB
63GB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 49 50 51 53 40 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Poor: 20% Great: 110%
Microsoft Virtual Disk 107GB
94GB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 46 46 49 48 43 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 5% Great: 95%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Microsoft Corporation None Corporation None Corporation None 32GB
0, 0, 0 MHz
3968, 12416, 16384 MB
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
8.7% Terrible
MC Read 3.1
MC Write 3.9
MC Mixed 2.4
9% 3.13 GB/s
SC Read 0.3
SC Write 4
SC Mixed 1.7
6% 2 GB/s
Latency 434
9% 434 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 8.7%
Great: 100%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,577 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback