Asus P8H61-M LX3 R2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive35.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsus P8H61-M LX3 R2.0  (all builds)
Memory5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.4 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130604
Uptime1.4 Days
Run DateJan 15 '21 at 00:10
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
74.6% Very good
Memory 89
1-Core 108
2-Core 211
78% 136 Pts
4-Core 325
8-Core 519
52% 422 Pts
64-Core 518
32% 518 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 74.6%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Lexar SSD 128GB
63GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V3.36
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 122 117 123 122 120 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
35.5% Below average
Read 218
Write 121
Mixed 121
SusWrite 117
32% 144 MB/s
4K Read 17.5
4K Write 35.6
4K Mixed 11.1
60% 21.4 MB/s
DQ Read 26
DQ Write 66.9
DQ Mixed 15.9
21% 36.3 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 35.5%
Great: 101%
WD Purple 2TB (2014)-$67
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 139 134 141 138 140 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
78.7% Very good
Read 140
Write 132
Mixed 74.5
SusWrite 134
88% 120 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
188% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 78.7%
Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-034.A00LF 9905403-011.A02LF 8GB
1400, 1400 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
52.9% Above average
MC Read 18.9
MC Write 18.2
MC Mixed 16.7
51% 17.9 GB/s
SC Read 15.4
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 18.2
49% 17.1 GB/s
Latency 68.4
58% 68.4 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 52.9%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8H61-M LX3 R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,687 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H61-M LX3 R2.0 - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $525
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback