HP EliteBook 8570w

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.75% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive36% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemHP EliteBook 8570w  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 176B
Memory11 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit väriä
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150407
Uptime1.8 Days
Run DateJan 16 '21 at 09:23
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3740QM-$220
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
69.2% Good
Memory 81.7
1-Core 96.8
2-Core 165
68% 115 Pts
4-Core 307
8-Core 440
47% 373 Pts
64-Core 438
27% 438 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 69.2%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K2000M
HP(103C 176B) 2GB
CLim: 745 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 385.73
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
5.75% Terrible
Lighting 6.6
Reflection 7.5
Parallax 8.1
5% 7.4 fps
MRender 7.9
Gravity 8.7
Splatting 7.3
6% 7.97 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.75%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 480GB-$250
56GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 603ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 93 62 71 68 68 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
36% Below average
Read 182
Write 161
Mixed 144
SusWrite 83.3
32% 143 MB/s
4K Read 18
4K Write 13.9
4K Mixed 16.8
56% 16.2 MB/s
DQ Read 208
DQ Write 68.3
DQ Mixed 82.9
76% 120 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 36%
Great: 65%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
931GB free, PID 0802
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 139 139 139 138 135 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
50.8% Above average
Read 128
Write 122
Mixed 21.2
SusWrite 138
134% 102 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.4
40% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 50.8%
Great: 51%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B1G73BH0-CK0 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
30.7% Below average
MC Read 10.7
MC Write 9.5
MC Mixed 8.7
28% 9.63 GB/s
SC Read 10.3
SC Write 11.6
SC Mixed 10.2
30% 10.7 GB/s
Latency 77.5
52% 77.5 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 30.7%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteBook 8570w Builds (Compare 904 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 8570w

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $100
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback