Gigabyte GA-78LMT-USB3 6.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-78LMT-USB3 6.0  (all builds)
Memory17.9 GB free of 20 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20141125
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 04 '17 at 04:57
Run Duration184 Seconds
Run User THA-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-6300-$90
Socket M2, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
57.5% Above average
Memory 78
1-Core 63.9
2-Core 130
55% 90.5 Pts
4-Core 203
8-Core 283
31% 243 Pts
64-Core 284
18% 284 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 57.5%
Great: 62%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Virtual Disk 859GB
88GB free
Firmware: 0
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
18.5% Very poor
Read 51.3
Write 12
Mixed 18.3
20% 27.2 MB/s
4K Read 2.27
4K Write 1.77
4K Mixed 0.22
152% 1.42 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 18.5%
Great: 45%
Virtual Disk 60GB
5GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
24.8% Poor
Read 70.6
Write 12.4
Mixed 21.1
26% 34.7 MB/s
4K Read 6.98
4K Write 4.18
4K Mixed 3.96
808% 5.04 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 24.8%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 20GB
null MHz
4096, 4096, 8192, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
38.2% Below average
MC Read 14.5
MC Write 12.2
MC Mixed 13.8
39% 13.5 GB/s
SC Read 8.9
SC Write 7.8
SC Mixed 10.2
26% 8.97 GB/s
Latency 84.4
47% 84.4 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 38.2%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-78LMT-USB3 6.0 Builds (Compare 1,731 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-78LMT-USB3 6.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $177
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback