Acer Veriton X2665G

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.29% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAcer Veriton X2665G  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Veriton X2665G
Memory1.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191205
Uptime1 Days
Run DateJan 22 '21 at 07:12
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User VNM-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium Gold G5420
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
67.1% Good
Memory 79
1-Core 102
2-Core 211
73% 131 Pts
4-Core 321
8-Core 313
43% 317 Pts
64-Core 321
20% 321 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 67.1%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Acer(1025 138D) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7262
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
3.29% Terrible
Lighting 3.3
Reflection 3.2
Parallax 4
3% 3.5 fps
MRender 5
Gravity 3.4
Splatting 7.2
4% 5.2 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.29%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
805GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 90 93 134 141 135 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
73.8% Very good
Read 140
Write 130
Mixed 86.8
SusWrite 116
87% 118 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.1
218% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 73.8%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR26D4U9S1KA-4 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
35.5% Below average
MC Read 13.8
MC Write 11.5
MC Mixed 10.2
34% 11.8 GB/s
SC Read 9.6
SC Write 11
SC Mixed 12.1
31% 10.9 GB/s
Latency 82.4
48% 82.4 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 35.5%
Great: 41%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Veriton X2665G Builds (Compare 71 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Veriton X2665G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 102% - Outstanding Total price: $155
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback