Today's hottest deals

MSI X58M (MS-7593)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 68%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 54%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics106% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive51.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemMSI MS-7593
MotherboardMSI X58M (MS-7593)  (all builds)
Memory15.9 GB free of 20.0039 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110401
Uptime3.1 Days
Run DateJan 29 '21 at 14:27
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 40%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-950-$84
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.05 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
65.7% Good
Memory 84.8
1-Core 75.8
2-Core 144
62% 102 Pts
4-Core 253
8-Core 397
40% 325 Pts
64-Core 393
24% 393 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 65.7%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 460.89
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
106% Outstanding
Lighting 134
Reflection 134
Parallax 145
109% 138 fps
MRender 116
Gravity 142
Splatting 120
103% 126 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 106%
Great: 110%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS1311 480GB-$31
360GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS131122
SusWrite @10s intervals: 201 219 220 160 150 162 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
51.2% Above average
Read 224
Write 220
Mixed 198
SusWrite 185
47% 207 MB/s
4K Read 22.3
4K Write 43.8
4K Mixed 27.1
92% 31.1 MB/s
DQ Read 28.6
DQ Write 75.2
DQ Mixed 36.4
32% 46.7 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 51.2%
Great: 101%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 56GB
null MHz
4096, 4096, 2048, 2048, 4096, 4096, 36864 MB
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
33.9% Below average
MC Read 13.1
MC Write 10.8
MC Mixed 9.7
32% 11.2 GB/s
SC Read 9.9
SC Write 9.1
SC Mixed 9.6
27% 9.53 GB/s
Latency 72.2
55% 72.2 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 33.9%
Great: 124%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X58M (MS-7593) Builds (Compare 144 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: MSI X58M (MS-7593)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $284
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback