Nutanix AHV

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemNutanix AHV  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory55.8 GB free of 64 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colors, 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140401
Uptime3.4 Days
Run DateJan 31 '21 at 23:55
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon Gold 6242R
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
80.2% Excellent
Memory 71.6
1-Core 119
2-Core 229
77% 140 Pts
4-Core 476
8-Core 918
83% 697 Pts
64-Core 1,869
116% 1,869 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 80.2%
Great: 80%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nutanix VDISK 215GB
80GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 130 133 126 66 84 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
74.7% Very good
Read 146
Write 143
Mixed 144
SusWrite 112
102% 136 MB/s
4K Read 4.9
4K Write 6
4K Mixed 5
871% 5.3 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 74.7%
Great: 105%
Nutanix VDISK 3TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 125 129 128 73 76 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
87.6% Excellent
Read 192
Write 126
Mixed 158
SusWrite 110
110% 147 MB/s
4K Read 5.3
4K Write 6.2
4K Mixed 5.4
936% 5.63 MB/s
Nutanix VDISK 1.5TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 133 128 135 77 66 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
86% Excellent
Read 185
Write 151
Mixed 166
SusWrite 112
114% 153 MB/s
4K Read 5.5
4K Write 6.2
4K Mixed 5.1
911% 5.6 MB/s
Nutanix VDISK 322GB
286GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 129 129 133 75 65 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
86.8% Excellent
Read 189
Write 124
Mixed 149
SusWrite 111
107% 143 MB/s
4K Read 5.4
4K Write 6.7
4K Mixed 5.3
938% 5.8 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 86.8%
Great: 91%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Red Hat 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM RAM
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
101% Outstanding
MC Read 45.4
MC Write 32
MC Mixed 49.6
121% 42.3 GB/s
SC Read 4.8
SC Write 7.2
SC Mixed 6.1
17% 6.03 GB/s
Latency 97.8
41% 97.8 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 101%
Great: 158%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical AHV Builds (Compare 16 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: Nutanix AHV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback