Lenovo 20157

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.33% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
SystemLenovo 20157  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Lenovo G580
Memory1.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 8
BIOS Date20121023
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 14 '21 at 11:16
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron 1000M
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
50.4% Above average
Memory 84.8
1-Core 49
2-Core 97.4
50% 77.1 Pts
4-Core 97.9
8-Core 93.1
13% 95.5 Pts
64-Core 95.7
6% 95.7 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 50.4%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (G3 Pentium/Celeron 1.0/1.1 GHz)
Legend(17AA 3977) 1.8GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4276
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
1.33% Terrible
Lighting 1.5
Reflection 0.5
Parallax 1.3
1% 1.1 fps
MRender 2.8
Gravity 1
Splatting 1.9
2% 1.9 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.33%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS545032A7E380 320GB
144GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GGBZBD90
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 43 41 35 42 44 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
14.2% Very poor
Read 11.5
Write 26.1
Mixed 12.3
SusWrite 37.8
16% 21.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.3
62% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14.2%
Great: 44%
SMI USB DISK 16GB
15GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.1 4.2 4 3.6 4 4.2 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
2.91% Terrible
Read 9
Write 0.3
Mixed 2.5
SusWrite 3.7
4% 3.88 MB/s
4K Read 3.4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
13% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.91%
Great: 26%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown R534G1601S1S-UO 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
31.8% Below average
MC Read 10.6
MC Write 10.6
MC Mixed 9.3
29% 10.2 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 9.1
SC Mixed 10
28% 9.87 GB/s
Latency 72.1
56% 72.1 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 31.8%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20157 Builds (Compare 359 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20157

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $80
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback