Cisco UCSC-C220-M4S

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory256GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 256GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemCisco UCSC-C220-M4S  (all builds)
MotherboardCisco UCSC-C220-M4S
Memory248.1 GB free of 256 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160620
Uptime7 Days
Run DateJun 16 '17 at 16:37
Run Duration76 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2697 v4
CPU1, 1 CPU, 18 cores, 36 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
63.3% Good
Memory 76.5
1-Core 65.2
2-Core 128
55% 89.7 Pts
4-Core 270
8-Core 588
50% 429 Pts
64-Core 2,019
125% 2,019 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 63.3%
Great: 78%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST1200MM0088 1TB
1TB free
Firmware: N003
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 202
Write 191
Mixed 184
145% 192 MB/s
4K Read 2.41
4K Write 1.49
4K Mixed 0.95
233% 1.61 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 113%
Great: 116%
Seagate ST1200MM0088 1TB
1TB free (System drive)
Firmware: N003
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 233
Write 157
Mixed 167
139% 185 MB/s
4K Read 2.13
4K Write 1.24
4K Mixed 0.86
206% 1.41 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 112%
Great: 116%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown M393A4K40BB1-CRC 8x31.9GB
8 of 24 slots used
255GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
135% Outstanding
MC Read 65.1
MC Write 51
MC Mixed 52.5
161% 56.2 GB/s
SC Read 9.1
SC Write 11.6
SC Mixed 13.2
32% 11.3 GB/s
Latency 87.4
46% 87.4 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 135%
Great: 135%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical UCSC-C220-M4S Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

System: Cisco UCSC-C220-M4S

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 44% - Average Total price: $92
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback