Average Bench: 6.45% (369th of 714)

Based on 34,519 user benchmarks.  Devices: 10DE 0FC1, 10DE 0FC0, 10DE 1282, 10DE 124B Model: NVIDIA GeForce GT 640

Terrible average bench

The Nvidia GeForce GT 640 averaged 93.5% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat) 7.47fps
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm) 8.16fps

Excellent consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Nvidia GeForce GT 640 is just 1.96%. This is an extremely narrow range which indicates that the Nvidia GeForce GT 640 performs superbly consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot) 8.1fps
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones) 9.08fps
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 34,519 samples)
Min Avg Max
6.2 Lighting 7.47 9
6.4 Reflection 8.1 10.6
7.3 Parallax 9.08 11
6.1% 8.22 fps
Min Avg Max
6.99 MRender 8.41 12.3
7.9 Gravity 9.83 11.5
6.7 Splatting 8.16 9.6
7.17% 8.8 fps
User Benchmarks Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
The fastest GPU (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
EVGA(3842 2642) 1GB
CLim: 1124 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 474.82
Lighting 9.7
Reflection 13.1
Parallax 11
8% 11.3 fps
MRender 11.4
Gravity 9
Splatting 7.4
7% 9.27 fps
MSI(1462 2756) 2GB
CLim: 941 MHz, MLim: 445 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Lighting 7.9
Reflection 8
Parallax 9.5
6% 8.47 fps
MRender 8.4
Gravity 10.5
Splatting 8.7
8% 9.2 fps
Asus(1043 83F3) 2GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 445 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Lighting 7.5
Reflection 8
Parallax 9.1
6% 8.2 fps
MRender 8.2
Gravity 10.1
Splatting 8.5
7% 8.93 fps
Asus(1043 83F9) 2GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 445 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 474.82
Lighting 7.5
Reflection 8
Parallax 9.1
6% 8.2 fps
MRender 8.2
Gravity 10
Splatting 8.5
7% 8.9 fps
Asus(1043 83F3) 2GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 445 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Lighting 7.5
Reflection 7.9
Parallax 9.2
6% 8.2 fps
MRender 8.1
Gravity 10.1
Splatting 8.4
7% 8.87 fps
Zotac(19DA 1269) 2GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 445 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Lighting 7.4
Reflection 8
Parallax 9.1
6% 8.17 fps
MRender 8.3
Gravity 10
Splatting 8.4
7% 8.9 fps
Zotac(19DA 1269) 2GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 445 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 474.44
Lighting 7.4
Reflection 7.8
Parallax 9.2
6% 8.13 fps
MRender 8
Gravity 10
Splatting 8.5
7% 8.83 fps
Asus(1043 83F3) 2GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 445 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Lighting 7.1
Reflection 7.5
Parallax 9.1
6% 7.9 fps
MRender 8
Gravity 9.7
Splatting 8.2
7% 8.63 fps
Nvidia(10DE 093D) 1GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 471.41
Lighting 1
Reflection 10.6
Parallax 0.1
1% 3.9 fps
MRender 12.5
Gravity 10.7
Splatting 0.3
6% 7.83 fps
34,519 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 67,470,228 GPUs tested

 Popular Cards (based on 34,519 benchmarks)

If you buy via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Hardware Id Samples Bench ± SD Model / Price
Asus(1043 83F3) 20% 6% ± 0%
Gigabyte(1458 353E) 15% 7% ± 0%
Nvidia(10DE 093D) 7% 7% ± 0%
MSI(1462 8A92) 5% 6% ± 0%
Device(1B0A 90C5) 5% 6% ± 0%
Palit(1569 0FC1) 5% 6% ± 0%
EVGA(3842 2643) 4% 6% ± 0%
Asus(1043 83F9) 4% 7% ± 0%
Asus(1043 8597) 4% 6% ± 0%
Gainward(10B0 0FC1) 3% 6% ± 0%
Nvidia(10DE 093C) 2% 6% ± 0%
Zotac(19DA 1258) 2% 6% ± 0%
MSI(1462 2756) 2% 6% ± 0%
Sapphire(174B 0640) 2% 6% ± 0%
MSI(1462 231B) 2% 5% ± 0%
EVGA(3842 2645) 2% 6% ± 0%
Nvidia(10DE 1019) 2% 7% ± 0%
Zotac(19DA 1269) 1% 6% ± 0%
MSI(1462 2319) 1% 5% ± 0%
Device(107D 2737) 1% 7% ± 1%
EVGA(3842 3645) 1% 7% ± 0%
PNY(196E 093C) 1% 6% ± 0%
Device(1642 3B86) 1% 6% ± 0%
Nvidia(10DE 100F) 1% 7% ± 0%
MSI(1462 275B) 1% 6% ± 0%
EVGA(3842 2641) 1% 6% ± 0%
Device(0000 0000) 1% 6% ± 0%
Gigabyte(1458 3608) 1% 7% ± 0%
Asus(1043 8462) 0% 7% ± 0%
EVGA(3842 2647) 0% 6% ± 0%
EVGA(3842 2649) 0% 6% ± 0%
Palit(1569 1282) 0% 7% ± 1%
Zotac(19DA 3267) 0% 6% ± 0%
Zotac(19DA 1324) 0% 7% ± 1%
MSI(1462 2757) 0% 6% ± 0%
Asus(1043 8540) 0% 5% ± 0%
POV(1ACC 641A) 0% 6% ± 0%
Zotac(19DA 2258) 0% 6% ± 0%
Gainward(10B0 1282) 0% 7% ± 0%
Gigabyte(1458 3610) 0% 7% ± 0%
Gigabyte(1458 3550) 0% 6% ± 0%
Send price feedback
Typical GeForce GT 640 Builds (Compare 2,099 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Dell XPS 8500

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $297

Popular GeForce GT 640 systems:

How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware
Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) April 2024 GPU Rankings

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

Added n/a ago.

Poor

2 years ago.

It's not for double screen or gaming !


Excellent

2 years ago.

Good for basic usage, basic in gaming


Good

3 years ago.

Pretty good low-mid card for its price. Also overclocking-wise and good cooling performance. But as of 2020, its obviously outdated for modern titles.


Poor

7 months ago.

IF ur comparing this in 2019, there are better chips like the MX 150 ,250 for reasonable cheap rpice


Excellent

5 years ago.

i can even play rainbow sig siege in this gpu


Poor

3 years ago.

A really old GPU that can read movies and can be used as desktop if you don't have an APU


Excellent

4 months ago.

Works great. It's a silent graphics card that does its job excellently. I recommend it considering that the 1 GB version, with 128 bits, has GDDR5 graphics memory, which helps PC games run much smoother.


Good

10 months ago.

Great for Desktop - bad for gaming.


Your
opinion?
714 Graphics Cards (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different GPUs perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback