Average Bench: 7.85% (261st of 639)

Based on 23,256 user benchmarks.  Devices: 10DE 0FC1, 10DE 0FC0, 10DE 1282, 10DE 124B Model: NVIDIA GeForce GT 640

Terrible average bench

The Nvidia GeForce GT 640 averaged 92.1% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy) 29.6fps
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat) 24.4fps

Excellent consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Nvidia GeForce GT 640 is just 2.48%. This is an extremely narrow range which indicates that the Nvidia GeForce GT 640 performs superbly consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot) 20.1fps
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones) 28.1fps
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 23,256 samples)
Min Avg Max
20.5 Lighting 24.4 28.3
17.7 Reflection 20.1 23
20.8 Parallax 28.1 33.9
6.4% 24.2 fps
Min Avg Max
15.9 MRender 18.8 26
23.6 Gravity 29.6 33.8
18 Splatting 23.4 27.5
7.97% 23.9 fps
User Benchmarks Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
The fastest GPU (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
Gigabyte(1458 353E) 2GB
CLim: 1045 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 432.00
Lighting 27.9
Reflection 23.2
Parallax 32
7% 27.7 fps
MRender 19.3
Gravity 35.5
Splatting 8.8
9% 21.2 fps
Nvidia(10DE 093C) 1GB
CLim: 950 MHz, MLim: 445 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 432.00
Lighting 25.4
Reflection 20.8
Parallax 21.8
7% 22.7 fps
MRender 18.2
Gravity 32
Splatting 25.3
8% 25.2 fps
Asus(1043 83F3) 2GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 445 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 378.49
Lighting 24.9
Reflection 18.9
Parallax 31
6% 24.9 fps
MRender 18.7
Gravity 30.5
Splatting 24
8% 24.4 fps
Asus(1043 83F3) 2GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 445 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 445.87
Lighting 23.9
Reflection 20.3
Parallax 28.4
6% 24.2 fps
MRender 18.2
Gravity 30
Splatting 24.6
8% 24.3 fps
POV(1ACC 642A) 2GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 445 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 432.00
Lighting 23.8
Reflection 19
Parallax 28.6
6% 23.8 fps
MRender 18.2
Gravity 28.9
Splatting 24.6
8% 23.9 fps
Device(1B0A 90C5) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 797 MHz, MLim: 445 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 431.07
Lighting 22.1
Reflection 18
Parallax 25.5
6% 21.9 fps
MRender 16.8
Gravity 27.1
Splatting 21.7
7% 21.9 fps
Asus(1043 8540) 3GB
CLim: 720 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 376.54
Lighting 20.7
Reflection 21.5
Parallax 16.7
5% 19.6 fps
MRender 18.7
Gravity 20.5
Splatting 23.2
6% 20.8 fps
Device(0000 0000) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 331.82
Lighting 3.1
Reflection 5.4
Parallax 1.1
1% 3.2 fps
MRender 7.7
Gravity 0.7
Splatting 5.1
1% 4.5 fps
23,256 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 28,753,705 GPUs tested.

 Popular Cards

Based on statistics from 23,256 user benchmarks.

Hardware Id Samples Bench ± SD Model / Price
Asus(1043 83F3) 20% 8% ± 0%
Gigabyte(1458 353E) 11% 9% ± 1%
Nvidia(10DE 093D) 8% 9% ± 0%
MSI(1462 8A92) 5% 8% ± 0%
Zotac(19DA 1258) 5% 8% ± 0%
Palit(1569 0FC1) 5% 8% ± 0%
Device(1B0A 90C5) 5% 7% ± 0%
EVGA(3842 2643) 5% 8% ± 0%
EVGA(3842 2645) 4% 7% ± 1%
Asus(1043 83F9) 3% 8% ± 0%
Asus(1043 8597) 3% 7% ± 0%
Nvidia(10DE 093C) 3% 8% ± 1%
MSI(1462 231B) 2% 6% ± 0%
Device(0000 0000) 2% 8% ± 1%
Gainward(10B0 0FC1) 2% 8% ± 0%
MSI(1462 2756) 1% 8% ± 0%
MSI(1462 2757) 1% 8% ± 0%
Nvidia(10DE 100F) 1% 9% ± 0%
EVGA(3842 2641) 1% 8% ± 0%
Sapphire(174B 0640) 1% 7% ± 0%
PNY(196E 093C) 1% 8% ± 1%
Asus(1043 840E) 1% 8% ± 0%
Gigabyte(1458 3608) 1% 7% ± 1%
Zotac(19DA 1324) 1% 7% ± 0%
Gigabyte(1458 3610) 1% 7% ± 0%
Asus(1043 8462) 1% 7% ± 0%
EVGA(3842 3645) 1% 8% ± 1%
Zotac(19DA 1269) 1% 8% ± 0%
Device(1642 3B86) 1% 8% ± 1%
Asus(1043 8540) 1% 6% ± 0%
Elitegroup(1019 3220) 0% 8% ± 0%
Gigabyte(1458 3550) 0% 8% ± 0%
MSI(1462 231A) 0% 6% ± 0%
Gigabyte(1458 363A) 0% 8% ± 0%
Zotac(19DA 2258) 0% 8% ± 0%
MSI(1462 2319) 0% 6% ± 0%
Gainward(10B0 1282) 0% 7% ± 0%
POV(1ACC 642B) 0% 8% ± 0%
EVGA(3842 2647) 0% 7% ± 1%
POV(1ACC 641B) 0% 8% ± 0%
Palit(1569 1282) 0% 8% ± 0%
Device(7377 0000) 0% 8% ± 0%
Sapphire(174B A644) 0% 7% ± 0%
Send price feedback
Typical GeForce GT 640 Builds (Compare 6,871 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat

System: Dell XPS 8500

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $184

Popular GeForce GT 640 systems:

How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.
Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) June 2020 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

Added n/a ago.

Poor

9 days ago.

просто потому что она у меня есть )


Good

18 months ago.

It's not for double screen or gaming !


Average

12 months ago.

IF ur comparing this in 2019, there are better chips like the MX 150 ,250 for reasonable cheap rpice


Excellent

14 months ago.

i can even play rainbow sig siege in this gpu


Your
opinion?
639 Graphics Cards (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list.

See how consistently different GPUs perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $165Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $49
Intel Core i5-9600K $196Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $345Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super) $500Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $240
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $36Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $74SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $75SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $681SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback