Average Bench: 6.99% (327th of 683)

Based on 34,672 user benchmarks.  Devices: 10DE 0FC1, 10DE 0FC0, 10DE 1282, 10DE 124B Model: NVIDIA GeForce GT 640

Terrible average bench

The Nvidia GeForce GT 640 averaged 93.0% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy) 9.99fps
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat) 7.7fps

Excellent consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Nvidia GeForce GT 640 is just 2.25%. This is an extremely narrow range which indicates that the Nvidia GeForce GT 640 performs superbly consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot) 8.48fps
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones) 9.07fps
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 34,672 samples)
Min Avg Max
6.3 Lighting 7.7 8.92
6.9 Reflection 8.48 11.1
5.9 Parallax 9.07 10.9
6.23% 8.42 fps
Min Avg Max
7.4 MRender 8.65 12.5
7.28 Gravity 9.99 11.8
6.7 Splatting 8.24 9.7
7.87% 8.96 fps
User Benchmarks Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
The fastest GPU (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
MSI(1462 8A92) 1GB
CLim: 1045 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 456.71
Lighting 9.6
Reflection 8.4
Parallax 10.7
8% 9.57 fps
MRender 11.5
Gravity 8.6
Splatting 7.4
7% 9.17 fps
Asus(1043 83F3) 2GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 445 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 461.92
Lighting 7.7
Reflection 8.1
Parallax 9.2
6% 8.33 fps
MRender 8.4
Gravity 10.2
Splatting 8.6
8% 9.07 fps
Asus(1043 840E) 1GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 445 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 473.81
Lighting 7.7
Reflection 8.3
Parallax 9.4
6% 8.47 fps
MRender 8.4
Gravity 10.2
Splatting 8.6
8% 9.07 fps
Asus(1043 83F3) 2GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 445 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Lighting 7.7
Reflection 8
Parallax 9.3
6% 8.33 fps
MRender 8.3
Gravity 10.2
Splatting 8.5
8% 9 fps
PNY(196E 093C) 2GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 445 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 460.79
Lighting 7.7
Reflection 8.3
Parallax 9.3
6% 8.43 fps
MRender 8.4
Gravity 10.1
Splatting 8.5
8% 9 fps
Zotac(19DA 1258) 2GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 473.47
Lighting 7.6
Reflection 7.7
Parallax 9
6% 8.1 fps
MRender 7.6
Gravity 10.2
Splatting 8.4
8% 8.73 fps
EVGA(3842 2641) 2GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 333 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 472.12
Lighting 7.4
Reflection 6.9
Parallax 8.6
6% 7.63 fps
MRender 6.4
Gravity 10.1
Splatting 7.9
8% 8.13 fps
MSI(1462 2319) 3GB
CLim: 720 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 391.25
Lighting 6.3
Reflection 9.4
Parallax 5.6
5% 7.1 fps
MRender 8.7
Gravity 6.9
Splatting 6.7
6% 7.43 fps
34,672 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 54,217,101 GPUs tested.

 Popular Cards

Based on statistics from 34,672 user benchmarks.

Hardware Id Samples Bench ± SD Model / Price
Asus(1043 83F3) 20% 7% ± 0%
Gigabyte(1458 353E) 12% 8% ± 0%
Nvidia(10DE 093D) 8% 8% ± 0%
MSI(1462 8A92) 7% 7% ± 0%
Palit(1569 0FC1) 6% 7% ± 0%
Asus(1043 83F9) 4% 7% ± 0%
Gainward(10B0 0FC1) 4% 7% ± 0%
Asus(1043 8597) 3% 6% ± 0%
Device(1B0A 90C5) 3% 6% ± 0%
Zotac(19DA 1258) 3% 7% ± 0%
EVGA(3842 2643) 3% 7% ± 0%
MSI(1462 231B) 3% 5% ± 0%
Nvidia(10DE 093C) 2% 7% ± 0%
Sapphire(174B 0640) 2% 6% ± 0%
MSI(1462 2756) 2% 7% ± 0%
Zotac(19DA 1269) 2% 7% ± 0%
PNY(196E 093C) 1% 7% ± 0%
EVGA(3842 2647) 1% 7% ± 0%
Asus(1043 840E) 1% 7% ± 0%
Asus(1043 8462) 1% 7% ± 0%
Asus(1043 8540) 1% 5% ± 0%
EVGA(3842 3645) 1% 7% ± 0%
EVGA(3842 2645) 1% 7% ± 0%
Device(0000 0000) 1% 7% ± 0%
MSI(1462 275B) 1% 6% ± 0%
Nvidia(10DE 100F) 1% 8% ± 0%
Gigabyte(1458 3608) 1% 8% ± 0%
EVGA(3842 2649) 1% 7% ± 0%
Zotac(19DA 2267) 1% 7% ± 0%
Gigabyte(1458 3550) 1% 7% ± 0%
EVGA(3842 2641) 0% 7% ± 0%
Palit(1569 1282) 0% 8% ± 0%
Nvidia(10DE 1019) 0% 7% ± 0%
MSI(1462 2319) 0% 5% ± 0%
MSI(1462 2757) 0% 7% ± 0%
Device(1642 3B86) 0% 6% ± 0%
Device(107D 2737) 0% 7% ± 0%
Zotac(19DA 2258) 0% 7% ± 0%
Zotac(19DA 1324) 0% 8% ± 0%
EVGA(3842 2642) 0% 8% ± 0%
Gainward(10B0 1282) 0% 7% ± 0%
POV(1ACC 642B) 0% 6% ± 0%
Gigabyte(1458 3610) 0% 8% ± 0%
XFX(1682 291A) 0% 7% ± 0%
Send price feedback
Typical GeForce GT 640 Builds (Compare 5,149 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Dell XPS 8500

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $297

Popular GeForce GT 640 systems:

How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) August 2022 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

Added n/a ago.

Poor

12 months ago.

It's not for double screen or gaming !


Excellent

4 months ago.

Good for basic usage, basic in gaming


Good

20 months ago.

Pretty good low-mid card for its price. Also overclocking-wise and good cooling performance. But as of 2020, its obviously outdated for modern titles.


Good

4 days ago.

IF ur comparing this in 2019, there are better chips like the MX 150 ,250 for reasonable cheap rpice


Excellent

3 years ago.

i can even play rainbow sig siege in this gpu


Poor

24 months ago.

A really old GPU that can read movies and can be used as desktop if you don't have an APU


Your
opinion?
683 Graphics Cards (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list.

See how consistently different GPUs perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $275Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $470Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $160Nvidia RTX 3070 $536Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $106
Intel Core i7-12700K $350Nvidia RTX 3050 $325Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $58SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $33Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $70SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $449SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback