Average Bench: 6.95% (305th of 661)

Based on 27,471 user benchmarks.  Devices: 10DE 0FC1, 10DE 0FC0, 10DE 1282, 10DE 124B Model: NVIDIA GeForce GT 640

Terrible average bench

The Nvidia GeForce GT 640 averaged 93.0% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy) 9.87fps
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat) 7.68fps

Excellent consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Nvidia GeForce GT 640 is just 2.36%. This is an extremely narrow range which indicates that the Nvidia GeForce GT 640 performs superbly consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot) 8.52fps
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones) 9.09fps
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 27,471 samples)
Min Avg Max
6.3 Lighting 7.68 9
7.1 Reflection 8.52 11
5.8 Parallax 9.09 10.9
6.2% 8.43 fps
Min Avg Max
7.4 MRender 8.72 12.6
6.9 Gravity 9.87 11.7
6.7 Splatting 8.2 9.7
7.8% 8.93 fps
User Benchmarks Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
The fastest GPU (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
Gigabyte(1458 353E) 2GB
CLim: 1065 MHz, MLim: 500 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 465.89
Lighting 9
Reflection 9.2
Parallax 10.7
7% 9.63 fps
MRender 9.6
Gravity 11.9
Splatting 10
9% 10.5 fps
Nvidia(10DE 093D) 1GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 456.71
Lighting 8.3
Reflection 11.1
Parallax 10.9
7% 10.1 fps
MRender 12.4
Gravity 10.8
Splatting 9.7
9% 11 fps
EVGA(3842 2643) 2GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 445 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Lighting 8.6
Reflection 8.2
Parallax 9.3
7% 8.7 fps
MRender 8.4
Gravity 10.1
Splatting 8.5
8% 9 fps
Gainward(10B0 0FC1) 2GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 445 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13
Lighting 7.9
Reflection 8.3
Parallax 9.4
6% 8.53 fps
MRender 8.4
Gravity 10.5
Splatting 8.5
8% 9.13 fps
Gigabyte(1458 353E) 2GB
CLim: 941 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 465.89
Lighting 8
Reflection 11.4
Parallax 9.6
6% 9.67 fps
MRender 8.6
Gravity 10.3
Splatting 8.9
8% 9.27 fps
Zotac(19DA 1258) 2GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 445 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 465.89
Lighting 7.7
Reflection 8.2
Parallax 9.3
6% 8.4 fps
MRender 8.4
Gravity 10.2
Splatting 8.6
8% 9.07 fps
Asus(1043 83F3) 2GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 445 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 461.92
Lighting 7.5
Reflection 8
Parallax 9.1
6% 8.2 fps
MRender 8.2
Gravity 10
Splatting 8.2
8% 8.8 fps
EVGA(3842 2641) 2GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 333 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Lighting 7.4
Reflection 7
Parallax 8.7
6% 7.7 fps
MRender 6.3
Gravity 10.1
Splatting 7.7
8% 8.03 fps
Sapphire(174B 0640) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 797 MHz, MLim: 445 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 385.69
Lighting 7
Reflection 7.3
Parallax 8.3
6% 7.53 fps
MRender 7.5
Gravity 9.2
Splatting 7.3
7% 8 fps
27,471 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 41,794,538 GPUs tested.

 Popular Cards

Based on statistics from 27,471 user benchmarks.

Hardware Id Samples Bench ± SD Model / Price
Asus(1043 83F3) 24% 7% ± 0%
Gigabyte(1458 353E) 12% 8% ± 0%
Nvidia(10DE 093D) 8% 8% ± 0%
Device(1B0A 90C5) 6% 6% ± 0%
MSI(1462 231B) 5% 6% ± 0%
MSI(1462 8A92) 4% 7% ± 0%
EVGA(3842 2643) 3% 7% ± 0%
Zotac(19DA 1258) 3% 7% ± 0%
Gainward(10B0 0FC1) 3% 7% ± 0%
Asus(1043 83F9) 2% 7% ± 0%
Asus(1043 8597) 2% 6% ± 0%
Nvidia(10DE 093C) 2% 7% ± 0%
MSI(1462 2756) 2% 7% ± 0%
Palit(1569 0FC1) 2% 7% ± 0%
Asus(1043 8462) 2% 8% ± 0%
Asus(1043 840E) 2% 7% ± 0%
Nvidia(10DE 100F) 1% 7% ± 1%
Zotac(19DA 1269) 1% 7% ± 0%
PNY(196E 093C) 1% 7% ± 0%
Gigabyte(1458 3608) 1% 7% ± 0%
Device(1642 3B86) 1% 6% ± 0%
EVGA(3842 2645) 1% 7% ± 1%
EVGA(3842 3645) 1% 7% ± 0%
Sapphire(174B 0640) 1% 6% ± 0%
MSI(1462 2757) 1% 7% ± 0%
EVGA(3842 2647) 1% 7% ± 0%
MSI(1462 275B) 1% 6% ± 0%
Asus(1043 8540) 1% 6% ± 0%
EVGA(3842 2649) 1% 7% ± 0%
EVGA(3842 2641) 1% 6% ± 0%
Palit(1569 1282) 1% 7% ± 0%
Zotac(19DA 1324) 1% 7% ± 0%
Device(0000 0000) 1% 7% ± 0%
Gainward(10B0 1282) 1% 7% ± 0%
Nvidia(10DE 1019) 0% 8% ± 0%
Zotac(19DA 2258) 0% 7% ± 0%
XFX(1682 291A) 0% 7% ± 0%
Gigabyte(1458 363A) 0% 7% ± 0%
Device(107D 2737) 0% 7% ± 0%
Zotac(19DA 3267) 0% 6% ± 0%
MSI(1462 2319) 0% 5% ± 0%
POV(1ACC 642A) 0% 6% ± 0%
POV(1ACC 642B) 0% 7% ± 0%
Gigabyte(1458 3550) 0% 7% ± 0%
Send price feedback
Typical GeForce GT 640 Builds (Compare 3,396 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Dell XPS 8500

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 65% - Good Total price: $365

Popular GeForce GT 640 systems:

How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.
Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) April 2021 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

Added n/a ago.

Good (edit your comment) Add link

4 months ago.

it can run cod mw 2019 at 29 fps


Poor

2 days ago.

просто потому что она у меня есть )


Good

4 months ago.

It's not for double screen or gaming !


Good

4 months ago.

Pretty good low-mid card for its price. Also overclocking-wise and good cooling performance. But as of 2020, its obviously outdated for modern titles.


Poor

2 months ago.

IF ur comparing this in 2019, there are better chips like the MX 150 ,250 for reasonable cheap rpice


Excellent

2 years ago.

i can even play rainbow sig siege in this gpu


Poor

8 months ago.

A really old GPU that can read movies and can be used as desktop if you don't have an APU


Your
opinion?
661 Graphics Cards (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list.

See how consistently different GPUs perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11400F $180Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Crucial MX500 250GB $48
Intel Core i5-11600K $265Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-10700K $315Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $73SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback