Today's hottest deals

Asus X99-DELUXE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics32.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive164% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
MotherboardAsus X99-DELUXE  (all builds)
Memory43.7 GB free of 48 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20141016
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 03 '16 at 22:30
Run Duration340 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
86.1% Excellent
Memory 89.6
1-Core 131
2-Core 253
88% 158 Pts
4-Core 444
8-Core 780
74% 612 Pts
64-Core 1,034
64% 1,034 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 86.1%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD FirePro W7100 (FireGL V)
HP(103C 030C) ≥ 4GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.2401.0
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
32.6% Below average
Lighting 40.3
Reflection 47.8
Parallax 57.9
33% 48.7 fps
MRender 45.7
Gravity 37.4
Splatting 36.5
32% 39.9 fps
Poor: 28%
This bench: 32.6%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 500GB
258GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
164% Outstanding
Read 982
Write 934
Mixed 952
214% 956 MB/s
4K Read 41
4K Write 90.4
4K Mixed 46.8
170% 59.4 MB/s
DQ Read 355
DQ Write 356
DQ Mixed 166
177% 292 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 164%
Great: 313%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$45
2TB free
Firmware: CC26 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
90.6% Outstanding
Read 159
Write 157
Mixed 153
118% 156 MB/s
4K Read 0.76
4K Write 1.51
4K Mixed 0.14
76% 0.81 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 90.6%
Great: 113%
WD My Passport 0820 1TB
417GB free
Firmware: 1007 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
56.2% Above average
Read 102
Write 93.8
Mixed 86.1
71% 94 MB/s
4K Read 0.52
4K Write 1.91
4K Mixed 0.21
81% 0.88 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 56.2%
Great: 57%
Generic Flash Disk 4GB
4GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
5.28% Terrible
Read 21.3
Write 4.12
Mixed 6.91
11% 10.8 MB/s
4K Read 5.41
4K Write 0.004
4K Mixed 0.004
20% 1.81 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 5.28%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLS8G4D240FSA.16FAR BLS8G4D240FSA.16FAR BLS4G4D240FSA.M8FAD BLS4G4D240FSA.M8FAD BLS4G4D240FSA.M8FAD BLS4G4D240FSA.M8FAD BLS8G4D240FSA.16FAR BLS8G4D240FSA.16FAR 48GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400, 2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
108% Outstanding
MC Read 41.5
MC Write 42.7
MC Mixed 40.8
119% 41.7 GB/s
SC Read 14.8
SC Write 24.4
SC Mixed 22.7
59% 20.6 GB/s
Latency 67.7
59% 67.7 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-DELUXE Builds (Compare 1,961 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus X99-DELUXE - $349

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $874
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $270WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback