Today's hottest deals

Dell OptiPlex 7010

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics34.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive53.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemDell OptiPlex 7010
MotherboardDell OptiPlex 7010  (all builds)
Memory13.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180628
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 02 '21 at 01:26
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470-$69
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
70.6% Very good
Memory 82.4
1-Core 99.4
2-Core 183
71% 122 Pts
4-Core 335
8-Core 370
46% 352 Pts
64-Core 361
22% 361 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 70.6%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
Gigabyte(1458 368F) 2GB
CLim: 1481 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 461.72
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
34.2% Below average
Lighting 44.4
Reflection 45.4
Parallax 40.4
36% 43.4 fps
MRender 35.7
Gravity 40.6
Splatting 35.3
30% 37.2 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 34.2%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS900 120GB-$25
37GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS900612
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 0.4 0.4 1 0.4 74 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
53.3% Above average
Read 311
Write 209
Mixed 240
SusWrite 32.6
44% 198 MB/s
4K Read 25.3
4K Write 46.2
4K Mixed 25.1
95% 32.2 MB/s
DQ Read 176
DQ Write 266
DQ Mixed 154
136% 199 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 53.3%
Great: 87%
Seagate Momentus XT 7200 RPM 2.5" 500GB
463GB free
Firmware: DEM4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 105 101 101 104 104 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
58.2% Above average
Read 100
Write 99
Mixed 66.7
SusWrite 102
68% 92.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
135% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 58.2%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5273DH0-CK0 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
59.7% Above average
MC Read 22
MC Write 22.8
MC Mixed 18
60% 20.9 GB/s
SC Read 18.2
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 18.1
51% 18 GB/s
Latency 76.2
52% 76.2 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 59.7%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical OptiPlex 7010 Builds (Compare 12,131 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Dell OptiPlex 7010

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $94
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback