Today's hottest deals

Asus P8Q77-M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics35.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive72.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P8Q77-M  (all builds)
Memory13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130703
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 09 '23 at 19:51
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
71.2% Very good
Memory 89.9
1-Core 98.1
2-Core 185
73% 124 Pts
4-Core 284
8-Core 481
46% 382 Pts
64-Core 488
30% 488 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 71.2%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
Gigabyte(1458 368E) 2GB
CLim: 1506 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 528.02
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
35.9% Below average
Lighting 46.5
Reflection 47.4
Parallax 42.6
38% 45.5 fps
MRender 37.3
Gravity 42.8
Splatting 37.3
32% 39.1 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 35.9%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 520 Series 120GB-$270
63GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 400i
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 132 136 135 137 136 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
72.2% Very good
Read 399
Write 157
Mixed 217
SusWrite 135
50% 227 MB/s
4K Read 29.7
4K Write 72.1
4K Mixed 34.5
127% 45.4 MB/s
DQ Read 236
DQ Write 159
DQ Mixed 187
143% 194 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 72.2%
Great: 88%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$23
466GB free
Firmware: MS1OA7S0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 179 181 171 182 177 163 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
99.9% Outstanding
Read 173
Write 154
Mixed 35.5
SusWrite 176
97% 134 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.5
124% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 99.9%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 859B CT51264BA160BJ.M8F 0D9B 0D9B 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
55.7% Above average
MC Read 20.2
MC Write 19.8
MC Mixed 16.9
54% 19 GB/s
SC Read 17.6
SC Write 18
SC Mixed 17.7
51% 17.8 GB/s
Latency 67.4
59% 67.4 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8Q77-M Builds (Compare 164 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus P8Q77-M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 65% - Good Total price: $472
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $330
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback