Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 48% Yacht	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	0.71% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	24.9% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Intel To be filled by O.E.M. (all builds)
Memory	2.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180305
Uptime	21.6 Days
Run Date	Mar 04 '21 at 12:03
Run Duration	155 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	12%

PC Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5 660 5,902 User benchmarks, average bench 49% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	50.1% Above average	Memory 67.8 1-Core 75.9 2-Core 130 55% 91.3 Pts	4-Core 189 8-Core 194 26% 191 Pts	64-Core 188 12% 188 Pts
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 50.1% Great: 55%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Clarkdale 0.733/0.9 GHz) 20,588 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Intel(8086 0042) 3.8GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2900 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.71% Terrible	Lighting 0.8 Reflection 1.4 Parallax 0.5 1% 0.9 fps	MRender 1.4 Gravity 0.4 Splatting 1.2 1% 1 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 0.71% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Team T253LE240G 240GB 3,478 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 48GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFM61.2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 85 73 51 19 20 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	24.9% Poor	Read 154 Write 103 Mixed 88.9 SusWrite 49.9 22% 99 MB/s	4K Read 14.8 4K Write 20.2 4K Mixed 12.5 49% 15.8 MB/s	DQ Read 13.7 DQ Write 19.4 DQ Mixed 16.2 12% 16.4 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 24.9% Great: 93%
Samsung 840 120GB-$109 51,792 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 10GB free Firmware: DXT07B0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 118 57 44 44 29 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	39.4% Below average	Read 224 Write 134 Mixed 111 SusWrite 70.9 30% 135 MB/s	4K Read 20.4 4K Write 46.7 4K Mixed 17.7 78% 28.3 MB/s	DQ Read 27.5 DQ Write 88.1 DQ Mixed 20.3 26% 45.3 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 39.4% Great: 73%
TDK LoR TF10 8GB 30 User benchmarks, average bench 4% 7GB free, PID 07f0 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.4 5 4.3 5.5 4.1 4.4 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	2.46% Terrible	Read 8.9 Write 2.2 Mixed 2.5 SusWrite 4.6 5% 4.55 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 3% 0.23 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.46% Great: 6%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 8GB 82,857 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 0, 0 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (31^st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	26.9% Poor	MC Read 8.8 MC Write 8.1 MC Mixed 10.8 26% 9.23 GB/s	SC Read 6.5 SC Write 6.4 SC Mixed 7.6 20% 6.83 GB/s	Latency 107 38% 107 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 26.9% Great: 51%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 46%

Yacht

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 99,513 samples	95x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	55x
HD Graphics (Clarkdale 0.733/0.9 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 20,588 samples	49x

Value: 55% - Above average

Total price: $98

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $64	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16