Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 23% Surfboard	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (11th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 89 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 22.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.37% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	30.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-2365M 2,016 User benchmarks, average bench 41% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.4 GHz, turbo 0.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	22.7% Poor	Memory 40 1-Core 12.9 2-Core 25.5 19% 26.1 Pts	4-Core 31.7 8-Core 41.9 5% 36.8 Pts	64-Core 44.6 3% 44.6 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 22.7% Great: 48%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz) 209,058 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Asus(1043 21FA) 2.5GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459 Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	1.37% Terrible	Lighting 1.7 Reflection 1.2 Parallax 1.4 1% 1.43 fps	MRender 2.2 Gravity 0.5 Splatting 2.1 1% 1.6 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.37% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung PM830 128GB 13,767 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 38GB free (System drive) Firmware: CXM03D1Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 181 170 170 164 208 181 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	30.3% Below average	Read 220 Write 245 Mixed 202 SusWrite 179 48% 212 MB/s	4K Read 5.8 4K Write 9 4K Mixed 8.9 25% 7.9 MB/s	DQ Read 67.8 DQ Write 48.8 DQ Mixed 71.1 50% 62.6 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 30.3% Great: 73%
Generic MassStorageClass 248GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 231GB free, PID 0756 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 21 38 36 36 37 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	15.1% Very poor	Read 26.1 Write 33.7 Mixed 32.4 SusWrite 31.7 44% 31 MB/s	4K Read 4.2 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 2.4 135% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 15.1% Great: 18%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron MT8KTF51264HZ-1G6 Elpida EBJ41UF8BCS0-DJ-F 8GB 17 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	19.7% Very poor	MC Read 6.8 MC Write 7.2 MC Mixed 8.2 21% 7.4 GB/s	SC Read 3.5 SC Write 3.2 SC Mixed 2.9 9% 3.2 GB/s	Latency 202 20% 202 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 19.7% Great: 48%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 47%

Yacht

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	658x
GeForce GT 720MNvidiaBench 4%, 4,823 samples	210x
HD Graphics (G3 Pentium/Celeron 1.0/1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 28,701 samples	50x

RAM
EBJ40UG8EFU0 1x4GBElpidaBench 29%, 3,036 samples	94x
MT8KTF51264HZ-1G6 1x4GBMicronBench 29%, 1,972 samples	75x
MT8KTF51264HZ-1G6 Hynix HMT425S6AFR6A-PB 6GBMicronBench 41%, 542 samples	37x

Value: 21% - Poor

Total price: $28