To Be Filled By O.E.M.

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics74.2% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardTo Be Filled By O.E.M.  (all builds)
Memory24.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display2048 x 1152 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190610
Uptime1.5 Days
Run DateMar 24 '21 at 12:37
Run Duration198 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 17%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-4620 0
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
55.8% Above average
Memory 69.8
1-Core 56.6
2-Core 120
50% 82.3 Pts
4-Core 226
8-Core 392
37% 309 Pts
64-Core 596
37% 596 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 460.89
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
74.2% Very good
Lighting 88.8
Reflection 103
Parallax 97
72% 96.3 fps
MRender 91.9
Gravity 96.9
Splatting 95.7
78% 94.8 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 74.2%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Pc300 NVMe SK hynix 256GB
12GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 20005A00 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 875
Write 356
Mixed 314
112% 515 MB/s
4K Read 22
4K Write 51.5
4K Mixed 27.4
96% 33.6 MB/s
DQ Read 372
DQ Write 234
DQ Mixed 276
213% 294 MB/s
Poor: 77% Great: 142%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130
431GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 385 350 405 417 422 422 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
91.4% Outstanding
Read 455
Write 427
Mixed 419
SusWrite 400
96% 425 MB/s
4K Read 25.8
4K Write 54.8
4K Mixed 35
113% 38.5 MB/s
DQ Read 318
DQ Write 286
DQ Mixed 293
222% 299 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 91.4%
Great: 133%
Intel 545s Series 256GB-$79
216GB free
Firmware: LHF004C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 209 193 219 225 227 224 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
55% Above average
Read 244
Write 231
Mixed 216
SusWrite 216
51% 227 MB/s
4K Read 19.4
4K Write 30.1
4K Mixed 23.6
76% 24.4 MB/s
DQ Read 176
DQ Write 199
DQ Mixed 157
127% 177 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 55%
Great: 117%
WD WD1501FASS-00U0B 1.5TB
539GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 87 89 87 87 88 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
56% Above average
Read 107
Write 106
Mixed 84.4
SusWrite 87.5
71% 96.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.1
204% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 56%
Great: 82%
Maxtor OneTouch 1TB
574GB free, PID 7310
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 25 25 25 25 25 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
10.9% Very poor
Read 29.9
Write 4.5
Mixed 9.5
SusWrite 24.9
21% 17.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.8
40% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 10.9%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B2G70BH0- 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
41.4% Average
MC Read 17.1
MC Write 14.9
MC Mixed 14.4
44% 15.5 GB/s
SC Read 9.2
SC Write 6.4
SC Mixed 7.1
22% 7.57 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 41.4%
Great: 93%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Be Filled By O.E.M. Builds (Compare 5,588 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: To Be Filled By O.E.M.

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $87
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback