Today's hottest deals

bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics45.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive308% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced.
MotherboardParallels Parallels Virtual Platform
Memory5 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display4020 x 3016 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210127
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 29 '21 at 18:23
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon W-2140B
CPU Socket #0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
58.3% Above average
Memory 72.5
1-Core 132
2-Core 256
83% 153 Pts
4-Core 256
8-Core 258
34% 257 Pts
64-Core 247
15% 247 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 58.3%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Parallels Display Adapter (WDDM)
ParallelsVM(1AB8 0400) 2GB
Driver: prl_umdd.dll Ver. 16.1.3.49160
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
45.9% Average
Lighting 58.5
Reflection 67
Parallax 67.1
48% 64.2 fps
MRender 55.6
Gravity 42.2
Splatting 56.6
43% 51.5 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 45.9%
Great: 47%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Parallels Virtual NVMe Disk 275GB
217GB free (System drive)
Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 804 902 725 810 850 786 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
308% Outstanding
Read 4,471
Write 2,641
Mixed 2,562
SusWrite 813
580% 2,622 MB/s
4K Read 64.8
4K Write 61.1
4K Mixed 62.7
211% 62.9 MB/s
DQ Read 354
DQ Write 266
DQ Mixed 328
240% 316 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 308%
Great: 308%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x8GB
1 of 8 slots used
8GB DIMM DRAM 667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
85.3% Excellent
MC Read 24.1
MC Write 41.8
MC Mixed 32.3
94% 32.7 GB/s
SC Read 13.3
SC Write 21.6
SC Mixed 18.1
50% 17.7 GB/s
Latency 95.8
42% 95.8 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 85.3%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,995 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $322
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback