Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 58% Gunboat	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	4.05% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	40.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

PC Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3210M-$52 79,744 User benchmarks, average bench 48% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	57.2% Above average	Memory 80.4 1-Core 82.7 2-Core 146 62% 103 Pts	4-Core 198 8-Core 200 27% 199 Pts	64-Core 200 12% 200 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 57.2% Great: 57%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz) 409,110 User benchmarks, average bench 3% HP(103C 179C) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	4.05% Terrible	Lighting 5.5 Reflection 1.8 Parallax 2.7 4% 3.33 fps	MRender 4.5 Gravity 2.3 Splatting 4.7 3% 3.83 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 4.05% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Disco virtuale Microsoft 107GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 72GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 52 52 54 53 53 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	40.7% Average	Read 338 Write 116 Mixed 139 SusWrite 53.3 35% 162 MB/s	4K Read 17 4K Write 23.7 4K Mixed 19.3 63% 20 MB/s	DQ Read 67.1 DQ Write 123 DQ Mixed 89.4 69% 93.1 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 40.7% Great: 84%
Asmt 2115 128GB 351 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 17GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 53 53 54 53 53 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	43.6% Average	Read 350 Write 199 Mixed 206 SusWrite 53.9 45% 202 MB/s	4K Read 18.3 4K Write 26.9 4K Mixed 21.5 70% 22.2 MB/s	DQ Read 74.7 DQ Write 129 DQ Mixed 79.2 66% 94.2 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 43.6% Great: 63%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5173CB0-YK0 Nanya NT4GC64B8HG0NS-DI 8GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	51.2% Above average	MC Read 18.1 MC Write 18.6 MC Mixed 16.7 51% 17.8 GB/s	SC Read 15.1 SC Write 15.6 SC Mixed 15.7 44% 15.5 GB/s	Latency 79.8 50% 79.8 ns
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 51.2% Great: 52%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 48%

Yacht

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	522x
Radeon HD 7500MAMDBench 4%, 12,745 samples	16x
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	8x

RAM
HMT351S6EFR8A-PB 1x4GBHynixBench 28%, 12,200 samples	16x
HMT351S6CFR8C-PB 1x4GBHynixBench 27%, 17,632 samples	13x
M471B5273CH0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 26%, 3,608 samples	12x

Value: 49% - Average

Total price: $227