Packard EasyNote MH36

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 15%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.89% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemPackard EasyNote MH36  (all builds)
MotherboardPACKARD EasyNote MH36
Memory1.3 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20081008
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 21 '21 at 13:19
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel T1600
U2E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.65 GHz
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
35.7% Below average
Memory 65.6
1-Core 19.2
2-Core 37.2
30% 40.7 Pts
4-Core 37.7
8-Core 37.9
5% 37.8 Pts
64-Core 38.1
2% 38.1 Pts
Poor: 19%
This bench: 35.7%
Great: 39%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Mobile Intel 45 Express Chipset Family
Device(1631 018B) 796MB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.1749
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
0.89% Terrible
Lighting 1.4
Reflection 0.6
Parallax 0.7
1% 0.9 fps
MRender 0.2
Gravity 0.7
Splatting 0.5
0% 0.47 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.89%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST9250827AS 250GB
221GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.AAA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 60 60 34 28 35 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
31% Below average
Read 62.7
Write 62.2
Mixed 39.4
SusWrite 45.2
39% 52.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
119% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 31%
Great: 35%
SanDisk SSD G5 BICS4 1TB
710GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 24 24 23 23 18 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
32.2% Below average
Read 31.4
Write 23
Mixed 25.7
SusWrite 22.8
34% 25.7 MB/s
4K Read 7.5
4K Write 6.8
4K Mixed 7.1
501% 7.13 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 32.2%
Great: 145%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x1GB
2 of 2 slots used
2GB SODIMM DDR2
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
12% Very poor
MC Read 4.5
MC Write 2.8
MC Mixed 2.9
10% 3.4 GB/s
SC Read 4.4
SC Write 2.8
SC Mixed 3.5
10% 3.57 GB/s
Latency 112
36% 112 ns
Poor: 6%
This bench: 12%
Great: 20%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EasyNote MH36 Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Packard EasyNote MH36

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 29% - Poor Total price: $155
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $250WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback