Asus SABERTOOTH 990FX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 57%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics92.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive90.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus SABERTOOTH 990FX  (all builds)
Memory11.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121016
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 28 '20 at 17:50
Run Duration255 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 12%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
62.1% Good
Memory 80.8
1-Core 69.7
2-Core 131
58% 94 Pts
4-Core 235
8-Core 400
39% 318 Pts
64-Core 398
25% 398 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 62.1%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$265
CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 445.87
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
92.5% Outstanding
Lighting 117
Reflection 108
Parallax 110
95% 111 fps
MRender 132
Gravity 104
Splatting 93.1
88% 110 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 92.5%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk G5 BICS4 1TB
502GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 415000WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 305 339 386 375 373 372 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
90.2% Outstanding
Read 457
Write 419
Mixed 365
SusWrite 358
90% 400 MB/s
4K Read 29.4
4K Write 58.4
4K Mixed 37.5
124% 41.8 MB/s
DQ Read 278
DQ Write 239
DQ Mixed 141
138% 219 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 90.2%
Great: 114%
Covecube Virtual Disk 2TB
10.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 16 15 15 16 15 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
31.1% Below average
Read 92.4
Write 146
Mixed 72.4
SusWrite 15.4
60% 81.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1.1
205% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 31.1%
Great: 105%
Covecube Virtual Disk 2TB
6.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 16 15 15 16 16 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
22.6% Poor
Read 60.9
Write 183
Mixed 105
SusWrite 15.4
68% 91.1 MB/s
4K Read 3
4K Write 5
4K Mixed 1.6
395% 3.2 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 22.6%
Great: 105%
External USB3.0 DISK02 8TB
3.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 16 15 15 16 16 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
13.6% Very poor
Read 25
Write 142
Mixed 15.2
SusWrite 15.4
74% 49.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1.2
115% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 13.6%
Great: 73%
External USB3.0 DISK00 12TB
3.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 30 31 31 31 31 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
50% Average
Read 188
Write 199
Mixed 51.9
SusWrite 30
144% 117 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 1.1
216% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 50%
Great: 71%
External USB3.0 DISK01 12TB
3.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 15 15 15 16 16 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
44.5% Average
Read 171
Write 180
Mixed 103
SusWrite 15.4
148% 117 MB/s
4K Read 2.8
4K Write 5.1
4K Mixed 1.7
242% 3.2 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 44.5%
Great: 90%
SanDisk SSD G5 BICS4 1TB
482GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 89 93 94 91 92 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
145% Outstanding
Read 286
Write 271
Mixed 222
SusWrite 91.1
282% 218 MB/s
4K Read 16.5
4K Write 25.9
4K Mixed 17.5
1,537% 20 MB/s
DQ Read 19.3
DQ Write 33
DQ Mixed 23.5
1,993% 25.3 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 145%
Great: 145%
External USB3.0 DISK03 10TB
3TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 30 31 31 31 31 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
31.1% Below average
Read 64.1
Write 163
Mixed 102
SusWrite 30.1
129% 89.8 MB/s
4K Read 2.1
4K Write 4.8
4K Mixed 1.5
222% 2.8 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 31.1%
Great: 92%
External USB3.0 DISK04 10TB
3.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 30 31 31 31 31 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
38.7% Below average
Read 117
Write 160
Mixed 104
SusWrite 30.1
138% 103 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 4.8
4K Mixed 1.2
210% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 38.7%
Great: 80%
ST1000LM 024 HN-M101M 1TB
481GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 86 87 86 87 87 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
36.5% Below average
Read 84.4
Write 55
Mixed 50.2
SusWrite 85.5
91% 68.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
90% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 36.5%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 32GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
30.2% Below average
MC Read 10.3
MC Write 9.9
MC Mixed 9.1
28% 9.77 GB/s
SC Read 9.5
SC Write 8.6
SC Mixed 9.6
26% 9.23 GB/s
Latency 79.1
51% 79.1 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 30.2%
Great: 101%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SABERTOOTH 990FX Builds (Compare 426 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus SABERTOOTH 990FX - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $527
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback