ADD TO PC
BUILD

Jingsha D8

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 27% Raft	Desktop 67% Battle cruiser	Workstation 25% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	39.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Jingsha D8 (all builds)
Motherboard	HUANANZHI X99-TF
Memory	3.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20770122
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 22 '21 at 18:49
Run Duration	140 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	5%

Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2630L v3 702 User benchmarks, average bench 67% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	72.1% Very good	Memory 79.9 1-Core 64.5 2-Core 139 57% 94.6 Pts	4-Core 346 8-Core 596 57% 471 Pts	64-Core 897 56% 897 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 72.1% Great: 75%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130 360,351 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Gigabyte(1458 22FD) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1150 MHz, MLim: 1800 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.4.1 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	39.2% Below average	Lighting 46.8 Reflection 54.7 Parallax 78.6 38% 60 fps	MRender 56.1 Gravity 59.4 Splatting 40.2 41% 51.9 fps
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 39.2% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HP EX900 NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$35 12,447 User benchmarks, average bench 163% 25GB free (System drive) Firmware: T0214B0L Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,444 Write 1,109 Mixed 878 253% 1,144 MB/s	4K Read 43.1 4K Write 122 4K Mixed 23.4 160% 62.7 MB/s	DQ Read 372 DQ Write 189 DQ Mixed 103 124% 221 MB/s
Poor: 103% Great: 228%
WD Blue 250GB (2010)-$43 50,270 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 14GB free Firmware: 15.01H15 SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 118 122 120 108 116 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	69.9% Good	Read 126 Write 121 Mixed 76.9 SusWrite 117 81% 110 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 1 176% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 69.9% Great: 70%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 250GB-$23 32,491 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 233GB free Firmware: KC48 SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 133 134 134 134 133 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	76.1% Very good	Read 132 Write 125 Mixed 65.7 SusWrite 133 83% 114 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.8 134% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 76.1% Great: 74%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown R7S48G2606U2S 1x8GB 56 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 1 of 16 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	33.8% Below average	MC Read 13 MC Write 10 MC Mixed 10.1 32% 11 GB/s	SC Read 11.3 SC Write 10.6 SC Mixed 10.8 31% 10.9 GB/s	Latency 80.8 50% 80.8 ns
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 33.8% Great: 51%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $64	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback