Acer Aspire TC-875

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 18% Surfboard	Desktop 86% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 16% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	13.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Acer Aspire TC-875 (all builds)
Motherboard	Acer Aspire TC-875
Memory	12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200519
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 24 '21 at 18:47
Run Duration	131 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-10100-$94 24,563 User benchmarks, average bench 80% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	93.4% Outstanding	Memory 92.4 1-Core 136 2-Core 261 91% 163 Pts	4-Core 513 8-Core 707 77% 610 Pts	64-Core 719 44% 719 Pts
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 93.4% Great: 86%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030 185,384 User benchmarks, average bench 14% PNY(196E 11C8) 2GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 525 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 466.11 Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	13.8% Very poor	Lighting 18.6 Reflection 13.4 Parallax 15.1 15% 15.7 fps	MRender 6 Gravity 17.5 Splatting 15.9 11% 13.1 fps
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 13.8% Great: 15%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 863GB free (System drive) Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 147 155 158 169 120 MB/s Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	94.9% Outstanding	Read 184 Write 179 Mixed 90.6 SusWrite 147 110% 150 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 1.3 239% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 94.9% Great: 109%
SDXC Card 64GB 12,175 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 27GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 27 27 27 26 27 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	17.3% Very poor	Read 17 Write 25.2 Mixed 18.7 SusWrite 26.6 31% 21.9 MB/s	4K Read 5.9 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 3.8 236% 4.07 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 17.3% Great: 41%
SanDisk Ultra 123GB 2,890 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 18GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 38 37 38 38 38 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	35.2% Below average	Read 135 Write 37.5 Mixed 67.2 SusWrite 36.9 79% 69.2 MB/s	4K Read 4.5 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 2.7 180% 3.1 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 35.2% Great: 39%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 8ATF1G64AZ-2G6E1 Samsung M378A1K43DB2-CTD 16GB 33 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 2667, 2667 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	86.4% Excellent	MC Read 33.5 MC Write 33.8 MC Mixed 24.3 87% 30.5 GB/s	SC Read 18.8 SC Write 35.9 SC Mixed 26.5 77% 27.1 GB/s	Latency 63.4 63% 63.4 ns
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 86.4% Great: 90%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Aspire TC-875 Builds (Compare 301 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire TC-875

CPU
Core i5-10400Intel $130Bench 84%, 71,804 samples	248x
Core i3-10100Intel $94Bench 80%, 24,563 samples	38x
Core i9-10900Intel $273Bench 94%, 11,130 samples	7x

GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 37,718 samples	193x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	24x
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	20x

SSD
RBUSNS8154P3512GJ1 512GBKingstonBench 126%, 5,630 samples	58x
PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G-1014 512GBWDCBench 168%, 18,999 samples	45x
MZVLQ512HALU-000AC 512GBSamsungBench 149%, 512 samples	19x

RAM
M378A1K43DB2-CTD 1x8GBSamsungBench 43%, 7,517 samples	26x
8ATF1G64AZ-3G2J1 1x8GBMicronBench 47%, 1,714 samples	25x
AM2P32NC8W1-BCFS 1x8GBAdataBench 34%, 1,264 samples	24x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 104% - Outstanding

Total price: $130

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16