Today's hottest deals

Asus B85M-E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics5.69% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive47.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus B85M-E  (all builds)
Memory6.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130701
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateApr 26 '21 at 23:35
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4670-$118
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
71.2% Very good
Memory 76.1
1-Core 86.6
2-Core 201
68% 121 Pts
4-Core 384
8-Core 376
51% 380 Pts
64-Core 384
24% 384 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 71.2%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI FirePro V4800 (FireGL V)
AMD(1002 240A) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
5.69% Terrible
Lighting 7
Reflection 8.9
Parallax 6
6% 7.3 fps
MRender 8.2
Gravity 5.3
Splatting 7.2
6% 6.9 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.69%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU900 512GB
237GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q0125A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 232 240 239 231 232 237 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
47.7% Average
Read 240
Write 117
Mixed 238
SusWrite 235
47% 207 MB/s
4K Read 8.9
4K Write 20.9
4K Mixed 11.8
40% 13.9 MB/s
DQ Read 271
DQ Write 246
DQ Mixed 249
190% 255 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 47.7%
Great: 113%
Adata SU900 1TB
62GB free
Firmware: Q0125A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 102 183 118 104 102 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
61.1% Good
Read 475
Write 222
Mixed 69.6
SusWrite 114
48% 220 MB/s
4K Read 25.2
4K Write 26.5
4K Mixed 27.3
87% 26.3 MB/s
DQ Read 317
DQ Write 31.8
DQ Mixed 66.6
76% 138 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 61.1%
Great: 116%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT102464BA160B.C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
55.6% Above average
MC Read 19.9
MC Write 21.6
MC Mixed 17.8
56% 19.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 17.5
SC Mixed 16.5
46% 16.1 GB/s
Latency 88.1
45% 88.1 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 55.6%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B85M-E Builds (Compare 3,051 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus B85M-E - $106

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $340
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback