| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (90th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 10 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master! |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 49.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
| Motherboard | Asrock A320M-HDV R4.0 (all builds) |
| Memory | 4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz |
| Display | Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20200716 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | May 05 '21 at 17:55 |
| Run Duration | 80 Seconds |
| Run User | RUS-User |
| Background CPU | 11% |
PC Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
74.8%
Very good
|
69% 122 Pts
|
57% 425 Pts
|
27% 430 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD RX 480-$75
CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.4.1
Performing below potential (75th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
49.4%
Average
|
51% 69.8 fps
|
47% 58.5 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
58GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
|
453% 2,041 MB/s
|
239% 83.2 MB/s
|
663% 853 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown IRX2666D464L16S/4G 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
|
101%
Outstanding
|
107% 37.6 GB/s
|
79% 27.5 GB/s
|
44% 89.9 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical A320M-HDV R4.0 Builds (Compare 5,992 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock A320M-HDV R4.0
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Ryzen 5 2600AMD $155Bench 73%, 179,588 samples | 868x |
| Ryzen 3 3200GAMD $75Bench 63%, 104,122 samples | 715x |
| Ryzen 5 3600AMD $83Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples | 543x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples | 455x |
| RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 424x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 403x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 88% - Excellent | Total price: $358 |