Toshiba SATELLITE L850D-12U

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.68% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive42.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemToshiba SATELLITE L850D-12U  (all builds)
MotherboardAMD PLCSC8
Memory4.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121002
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateMay 20 '21 at 22:56
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-4600M APU
Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
50.6% Above average
Memory 78.2
1-Core 47.6
2-Core 84.9
46% 70.2 Pts
4-Core 136
8-Core 135
18% 136 Pts
64-Core 137
8% 137 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 50.6%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7660G
Toshiba(1179 FB3B) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
4.68% Terrible
Lighting 5.6
Reflection 8.1
Parallax 6.1
5% 6.6 fps
MRender 5.5
Gravity 5.6
Splatting 6.6
5% 5.9 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.68%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 240GB
160GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF5100RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 182 16 36 16 157 96 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
42.4% Average
Read 396
Write 302
Mixed 272
SusWrite 83.9
59% 263 MB/s
4K Read 15.7
4K Write 26.4
4K Mixed 16.2
58% 19.4 MB/s
DQ Read 74.8
DQ Write 76.3
DQ Mixed 43.7
42% 64.9 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 42.4%
Great: 56%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown PRINCETON Samsung M471B5173BH0-CK0 8GB
800, 800 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
28.4% Poor
MC Read 12.8
MC Write 5.4
MC Mixed 10.3
27% 9.5 GB/s
SC Read 6.8
SC Write 5.9
SC Mixed 9
21% 7.23 GB/s
Latency 83.9
48% 83.9 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 28.4%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback