Today's hottest deals

HP Pavilion 17 Notebook PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 26%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (6th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 94 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.17% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemHP Pavilion 17 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1985
Memory6.6 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140416
Uptime14.1 Days
Run DateAug 11 '21 at 02:12
Run Duration230 Seconds
Run User MAR-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-4600M APU
Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
29.8% Poor
Memory 40
1-Core 40
2-Core 70.9
30% 50.3 Pts
4-Core 115
8-Core 107
15% 111 Pts
64-Core 108
7% 108 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 29.8%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7660G
HP(103C 1985) 768MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1101.0
Relative performance (0th percentile)
1.17% Terrible
Lighting 0.1
Reflection 4.1
Parallax 3
0% 2.4 fps
MRender 3.1
Gravity 2.7
Splatting 5.6
3% 3.8 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 1.17%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MQ01ABF050 500GB-$32
334GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AM002C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 52 64 49 39 19 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
20.8% Poor
Read 24.4
Write 73.4
Mixed 17.5
SusWrite 47.9
30% 40.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.1
30% 0.3 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 20.8%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Elpida EBJ40UG8EFU0-GN-F Adata AM1L16BC8R2-B1QS 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
12.8% Very poor
MC Read 5.4
MC Write 2.9
MC Mixed 4.4
12% 4.23 GB/s
SC Read 3.7
SC Write 3.4
SC Mixed 4.3
11% 3.8 GB/s
Latency 202
20% 202 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 12.8%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 28 14 4 60 17.3" 1600 900 CPT1F42
Typical Pavilion 17 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 1,246 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion 17 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback